History of R-1 SS 78 - History

History of R-1 SS 78 - History

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.


(Submarine No. 78: dp. 569 (surf.), 680 (subm.), l. 186'2"; b. 18'; dr. 14'6"; s. 13.5 k. (surf.), 10.5 k. (subm.), epl 30 a. 1 3", 4 21" tt.; cl. it-l)

R-1 (Submarine No. 78) was laid down 16 October 1917 by the Fore River Shipbuilding Co., Quincy, Mass., launched 24 August 1918, sponsored by Mrs. George tV. Dashiell, and commissioned 16 December 1918 at Boston, Comdr. Conant Taylor in command.

After shakedown in New England waters, R-l was assigned to Submarine Division 9 of the Atlantic Fleet and based at New London, Conn. She got underway 4 December 1919 for Norfolk and winter exercises with her division in the Gulf of Mexico, and returned to New London 18 May 1920 for 4 months of summer operations with R-2 and R-S before sailing 13 September for Norfolk and overhaul.

Designated SS-78 in July 1920, R-l was ordered to the Pacific 11 April 1921, transited the Panama Canal in late May, and arrived on 30 June at her new base, San Pedro Calif. She took part in fleet exercises off Central America from 5 February through 6 APril 1923, returned to San Pedro on 10 April, and on 16 July was transferred, along with Division 9, to Pearl Harbor where for the next 8 years she trained crews and developed submarine taeties.

Departing San Diego 5 January 19 1, R-l sailed for Philadelphia via the Panama Canal, arrived 9 February and was decommissioned there 1 May 1931. She was recommissioned in ordinary 23 September 1940 at Groton, Conn., overhauled and commissioned in full 16 October. R-l got underway with Submarine Squadron 3, Division 42 on 10 December for the Panama Canal Z

At New London on 7 December 1941, R-1 remained in the southern New England area for the first days of American participation in World War II. On the 9th and 10th she patrolled the sealanes leading to New England and on the 11th arrived at Bermuda, whence, with other SubRon 7 boats, she joined the hunt for U-boats preying on maritime traffic along the North American coast. Although limited in cruising range, the it-boats operating out of Ordnanee Island, continued their patrols through the Nazi submarine offensive of early 1942.

In February, the submarines established a patrol line between Bermuda and Nantucket Island. On that patrol line some 300 miles northeast of Bermuda, R-l sighted attacked and probably damaged a surfaced U-boat on 16 April.

R-l continued patrols out of Bermuda until returning to New London 20 July for upkeep and coastal patrols. At the end of September, she resumed operations out of Bermuda. Through November 1944 she rotated between Bermuda and New London and, at the latter, in December underwent an extensive conversion to enable her to participate in the development of ASW equipment and tseties. Emerging from the yard 26 February 1945, she steamed to New York on the 28th; then headed south to Florida for 3 weeks of operations off Port Everglades. In April she returned to New London thence steamed to Caseo Bay for further ASW tests. Returning to the Thames River base 29 June, she headed south again 7 July and at midmonth reported for duty with the Fleet Sonar School at Key West, where she served for the remainder of her career.

R-1 decommissioned at Key West 20 September 1945 and was struck from the Navy list 10 November. Still at Key West awaiting disposal on 21 February 1946, the overage submarine sank in 21 feet of water. Raised 3 days later, she was sold for scrap 13 March 1946 to Macey O. Smith of Miami.

S is a language that was developed by John Chambers and others at the old Bell Telephone Laboratories, originally part of AT&T Corp. S was initiated in 1976 as an internal statistical analysis environment—originally implemented as Fortran libraries. Early versions of the language did not even contain functions for statistical modeling.

In 1988 the system was rewritten in C and began to resemble the system that we have today (this was Version 3 of the language). The book Statistical Models in S by Chambers and Hastie (the white book) documents the statistical analysis functionality. Version 4 of the S language was released in 1998 and is the version we use today. The book Programming with Data by John Chambers (the green book) documents this version of the language.

Since the early 90’s the life of the S language has gone down a rather winding path. In 1993 Bell Labs gave StatSci (later Insightful Corp.) an exclusive license to develop and sell the S language. In 2004 Insightful purchased the S language from Lucent for $2 million. In 2006, Alcatel purchased Lucent Technologies and is now called Alcatel-Lucent.

Insightful sold its implementation of the S language under the product name S-PLUS and built a number of fancy features (GUIs, mostly) on top of it—hence the “PLUS”. In 2008 Insightful was acquired by TIBCO for $25 million. As of this writing TIBCO is the current owner of the S language and is its exclusive developer.

The fundamentals of the S language itself has not changed dramatically since the publication of the Green Book by John Chambers in 1998. In 1998, S won the Association for Computing Machinery’s Software System Award, a highly prestigious award in the computer science field.


Forerunner of the SS

By 1923, the Nazi Party led by Adolf Hitler had created a small volunteer guard unit known as the Saal-Schutz (Hall Security) to provide security at their meetings in Munich. [4] [5] The same year, Hitler ordered the formation of a small bodyguard unit dedicated to his personal service. He wished it to be separate from the "suspect mass" of the party, including the paramilitary Sturmabteilung ("Storm Battalion" SA), which he did not trust. [6] The new formation was designated the Stabswache (Staff Guard). [7] Originally the unit was composed of eight men, commanded by Julius Schreck and Joseph Berchtold, and was modeled after the Erhardt Naval Brigade, a Freikorps of the time. The unit was renamed Stoßtrupp (Shock Troops) in May 1923. [8] [9]

The Stoßtrupp was abolished after the failed 1923 Beer Hall Putsch, an attempt by the Nazi Party to seize power in Munich. [10] In 1925, Hitler ordered Schreck to organize a new bodyguard unit, the Schutzkommando (Protection Command). [1] It was tasked with providing personal protection for Hitler at party functions and events. That same year, the Schutzkommando was expanded to a national organization and renamed successively the Sturmstaffel (Storm Squadron), and finally the Schutzstaffel (Protection Squad SS). [11] Officially, the SS marked its foundation on 9 November 1925 (the second anniversary of the Beer Hall Putsch). [12] The new SS protected party leaders throughout Germany. Hitler's personal SS protection unit was later enlarged to include combat units. [13]

Early commanders

Schreck, a founding member of the SA and a close confidant of Hitler, became the first SS chief in March 1925. [14] On 15 April 1926, Joseph Berchtold succeeded him as chief of the SS. Berchtold changed the title of the office to Reichsführer-SS (Reich Leader-SS). [15] Berchtold was considered more dynamic than his predecessor, but became increasingly frustrated by the authority the SA had over the SS. [16] This led to him transferring leadership of the SS to his deputy, Erhard Heiden, on 1 March 1927. [17] Under Heiden's leadership, a stricter code of discipline was enforced than would have been tolerated in the SA. [16]

Between 1925 and 1929, the SS was considered to be a small Gruppe (battalion) of the SA. [18] Except in the Munich area, the SS was unable to maintain any momentum in its membership numbers, which declined from 1,000 to 280 as the SA continued its rapid growth. [19] As Heiden attempted to keep the SS from dissolving, Heinrich Himmler became his deputy in September 1927. Himmler displayed good organizational abilities compared to Heiden. [18] The SS established a number of Gaus (regions or provinces). The SS-Gaus consisted of SS-Gau Berlin, SS-Gau Berlin Brandenburg, SS-Gau Franken, SS-Gau Niederbayern, SS-Gau Rheinland-Süd, and SS-Gau Sachsen. [20]

Himmler appointed

With Hitler's approval, Himmler assumed the position of Reichsführer-SS in January 1929. [21] [22] There are differing accounts of the reason for Heiden's dismissal from his position as head of the SS. The party announced that it was for "family reasons." [23] Under Himmler, the SS expanded and gained a larger foothold. He considered the SS an elite, ideologically driven National Socialist organization, a "conflation of Teutonic knights, the Jesuits, and Japanese Samurai". [24] His ultimate aim was to turn the SS into the most powerful organization in Germany and most influential branch of the party. [25] He expanded the SS to 3,000 members in his first year as its leader. [24]

In 1929, the SS-Hauptamt (main SS office) was expanded and reorganized into five main offices dealing with general administration, personnel, finance, security, and race matters. At the same time, the SS-Gaue were divided into three SS-Oberführerbereiche areas, namely the SS-Oberführerbereich Ost, SS-Oberführerbereich West, and SS-Oberführerbereich Süd. [26] The lower levels of the SS remained largely unchanged. Although officially still considered a sub-organization of the SA and answerable to the Stabschef (SA Chief of Staff), it was also during this time that Himmler began to establish the independence of the SS from the SA. [27] The SS grew in size and power due to its exclusive loyalty to Hitler, as opposed to the SA, which was seen as semi-independent and a threat to Hitler's hegemony over the party, mainly because they demanded a "second revolution" beyond the one that brought the Nazi Party to power. [28] By the end of 1933, the membership of the SS reached 209,000. [29] Under Himmler's leadership, the SS continued to gather greater power as more and more state and party functions were assigned to its jurisdiction. Over time the SS became answerable only to Hitler, a development typical of the organizational structure of the entire Nazi regime, where legal norms were replaced by actions undertaken under the Führerprinzip (leader principle), where Hitler's will was considered to be above the law. [30]

In the latter half of 1934, Himmler oversaw the creation of SS-Junkerschule, institutions where SS officer candidates received leadership training, political and ideological indoctrination, and military instruction. The training stressed ruthlessness and toughness as part of the SS value system, which helped foster a sense of superiority among the men and taught them self-confidence. [31] The first schools were established at Bad Tölz and Braunschweig, with additional schools opening at Klagenfurt and Prague during the war. [32]


The SS was regarded as the Nazi Party's elite unit. [33] In keeping with the racial policy of Nazi Germany, in the early days all SS officer candidates had to provide proof of Aryan ancestry back to 1750 and for other ranks to 1800. [34] Once the war started and it became more difficult to confirm ancestry, the regulation was amended to just proving the candidate's grandparents were Aryan, as spelled out in the Nuremberg Laws. [35] Other requirements were complete obedience to the Führer and a commitment to the German people and nation. [36] Himmler also tried to institute physical criteria based on appearance and height, but these requirements were only loosely enforced, and over half the SS men did not meet the criteria. [37] Inducements such as higher salaries and larger homes were provided to members of the SS since they were expected to produce more children than the average German family as part of their commitment to Nazi Party doctrine. [38]

Commitment to SS ideology was emphasized throughout the recruitment, membership process, and training. [40] Members of the SS were indoctrinated in the racial policy of Nazi Germany and were taught that it was necessary to remove from Germany people deemed by that policy as inferior. [41] Esoteric rituals and the awarding of regalia and insignia for milestones in the SS man's career suffused SS members even further with Nazi ideology. [42] Members were expected to renounce their Christian faith, and Christmas was replaced with a solstice celebration. [43] Church weddings were replaced with SS Ehewein, a pagan ceremony invented by Himmler. [44] These pseudo-religious rites and ceremonies often took place near SS-dedicated monuments or in special SS-designated places. [45] In 1933, Himmler bought Wewelsburg, a castle in Westphalia. He initially intended it to be used as an SS training center, but its role came to include hosting SS dinners and neo-pagan rituals. [46]

In 1936, Himmler wrote in the pamphlet "The SS as an Anti-Bolshevist Fighting Organization":

We shall take care that never again in Germany, the heart of Europe, will the Jewish-Bolshevik revolution of subhumans be able to be kindled either from within or through emissaries from without. [47]

The SS ideology included the application of brutality and terror as a solution to military and political problems. [48] The SS stressed total loyalty and obedience to orders unto death. Hitler used this as a powerful tool to further his aims and those of the Nazi Party. The SS was entrusted with the commission of atrocities, illegal activities, and war crimes. Himmler once wrote that an SS man "hesitates not for a single instant, but executes unquestioningly . " any Führer-Befehl (Führer order). [49] Their official motto was "Meine Ehre heißt Treue" (My Honour is Loyalty). [50]

As part of its race-centric functions during World War II, the SS oversaw the isolation and displacement of Jews from the populations of the conquered territories, seizing their assets and deporting them to concentration camps and ghettos, where they were used as slave labor or immediately killed. [35] Chosen to implement the Final Solution ordered by Hitler, the SS were the main group responsible for the institutional killing and democide of more than 20 million people during the Holocaust, including approximately 5.2 million [51] to 6 million [3] Jews and 10.5 million Slavs. [51] A significant number of victims were members of other racial or ethnic groups such as the 258,000 Romani. [51] The SS was involved in killing people viewed as threats to race hygiene or Nazi ideology, including the mentally or physically handicapped, homosexuals, and political dissidents. Members of trade unions and those perceived to be affiliated with groups that opposed the regime (religious, political, social, and otherwise), or those whose views were contradictory to the goals of the Nazi Party government, were rounded up in large numbers these included clergy of all faiths, Jehovah's Witnesses, Freemasons, Communists, and Rotary Club members. [52] According to the judgments rendered at the Nuremberg trials, as well as many war crimes investigations and trials conducted since then, the SS was responsible for the majority of Nazi war crimes. In particular, it was the primary organization that carried out the Holocaust. [53]

After Hitler and the Nazi Party came to power on 30 January 1933, the SS was considered a state organization and a branch of the government. [54] Law enforcement gradually became the purview of the SS, and many SS organizations became de facto government agencies. [55]

The SS established a police state within Nazi Germany, using the secret state police and security forces under Himmler's control to suppress resistance to Hitler. [56] In his role as Minister President of Prussia, Hermann Göring had in 1933 created a Prussian secret police force, the Geheime Staatspolizei or Gestapo, and appointed Rudolf Diels as its head. Concerned that Diels was not ruthless enough to use the Gestapo effectively to counteract the power of the SA, Göring handed over its control to Himmler on 20 April 1934. [57] Also on that date, in a departure from long-standing German practice that law enforcement was a state and local matter, Hitler appointed Himmler chief of all German police outside Prussia. Himmler named his deputy and protégé Reinhard Heydrich chief of the Gestapo on 22 April 1934. Heydrich also continued as head of the Sicherheitsdienst (SD security service). [58]

The Gestapo's transfer to Himmler was a prelude to the Night of the Long Knives, in which most of the SA leadership were arrested and subsequently executed. [59] The SS and Gestapo carried out most of the killings. On 20 July 1934, Hitler detached the SS from the SA, which was no longer an influential force after the purge. The SS became an elite corps of the Nazi Party, answerable only to Hitler. Himmler's title of Reichsführer-SS now became his actual rank – and the highest rank in the SS, equivalent to the rank of field marshal in the army (his previous rank was Obergruppenführer). [60] As Himmler's position and authority grew, so in effect did his rank. [61]

On 17 June 1936, all police forces throughout Germany were united under the purview of Himmler and the SS. [55] Himmler and Heydrich thus became two of the most powerful men in the country's administration. [62] Police and intelligence forces brought under their administrative control included the SD, Gestapo, Kriminalpolizei (Kripo criminal investigative police), and Ordnungspolizei (Orpo regular uniformed police). [63] In his capacity as police chief, Himmler was nominally subordinate to Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick. In practice, since the SS answered only to Hitler, the de facto merger of the SS and the police made the police independent of Frick's control. [54] [64] In September 1939, the security and police agencies, including the Sicherheitspolizei (SiPo security police) and SD (but not the Orpo), were consolidated into the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA), headed by Heydrich. [65] This further increased the collective authority of the SS. [66]

During Kristallnacht (9–10 November 1938), SS security services clandestinely coordinated violence against Jews as the SS, Gestapo, SD, Kripo, SiPo, and regular police did what they could to ensure that while Jewish synagogues and community centers were destroyed, Jewish-owned businesses and housing remained intact so that they could later be seized. [67] In the end, thousands of Jewish businesses, homes, and graveyards were vandalized and looted, particularly by members of the SA. Some 500 to 1,000 synagogues were destroyed, mostly by arson. [68] On 11 November, Heydrich reported a death toll of 36 people, but later assessments put the number of deaths at up to two thousand. [69] [70] On Hitler's orders, around 30,000 Jewish men were arrested and sent to concentration camps by 16 November. [71] As many as 2,500 of these people died in the following months. [69] It was at this point that the SS state began in earnest its campaign of terror against political and religious opponents, who they imprisoned without trial or judicial oversight for the sake of "security, re-education, or prevention". [72] [73]

In September 1939, the authority of the SS expanded further when the senior SS officer in each military district also became its chief of police. [74] Most of these SS and police leaders held the rank of SS-Gruppenführer or above, and answered directly to Himmler in all SS matters within their district. Their role was to police the population and oversee the activities of the SS men within their district. [75] By declaring an emergency, they could bypass the district administrative offices for the SS, SD, SiPo, SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV concentration camp guards), and Orpo, thereby gaining direct operational control of these groups. [76]

Hitler's personal bodyguards

As the SS grew in size and importance, so too did Hitler's personal protection forces. [77] Three main SS groups were assigned to protect Hitler. In 1933, his larger personal bodyguard unit (previously the 1st SS-Standarte) was called to Berlin to replace the Army Chancellery Guard, assigned to protect the Chancellor of Germany. [78] Sepp Dietrich commanded the new unit, previously known as SS-Stabswache Berlin the name was changed to SS-Sonderkommando Berlin. In November 1933, the name was changed to Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler. In April 1934, Himmler modified the name to Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (LSSAH). The LSSAH guarded Hitler's private residences and offices, providing an outer ring of protection for the Führer and his visitors. [79] LSSAH men manned sentry posts at the entrances to the old Reich Chancellery and the new Reich Chancellery. [80] The number of LSSAH guards was increased during special events. [81] At the Berghof, Hitler's residence in the Obersalzberg, a large contingent of the LSSAH patrolled an extensive cordoned security zone. [82]

From 1941 forward, the Leibstandarte became four distinct entities, the Waffen-SS division (unconnected to Hitler's protection but a formation of the Waffen-SS), the Berlin Chancellory Guard, the SS security regiment assigned to the Obersalzberg, and a Munich-based bodyguard unit which protected Hitler when he visited his apartment and the Brown House Nazi Party headquarters in Munich. [83] [84] Although the unit was nominally under Himmler, Dietrich was the real commander and handled day-to-day administration. [85]

Two other SS units composed the inner ring of Hitler's protection. The SS-Begleitkommando des Führers (Escort Command of the Führer), formed in February 1932, served as Hitler's protection escort while he was traveling. This unit consisted of eight men who served around the clock protecting Hitler in shifts. [86] Later the SS-Begleitkommando was expanded and became known as the Führerbegleitkommando (Führer Escort Command FBK). It continued under separate command and remained responsible for Hitler's protection. [87] The Führer Schutzkommando (Führer Protection Command FSK) was a protection unit founded by Himmler in March 1933. [88] Originally it was charged with protecting Hitler only while he was inside the borders of Bavaria. In early 1934, they replaced the SS-Begleitkommando for Hitler's protection throughout Germany. [89] The FSK was renamed the Reichssicherheitsdienst (Reich Security Service RSD) in August 1935. [90] Johann Rattenhuber, chief of the RSD, for the most part, took his orders directly from Hitler. [90] The current FBK chief acted as his deputy. Wherever Hitler was in residence, members of the RSD and FBK would be present. RSD men patrolled the grounds and FBK men provided close security protection inside. The RSD and FBK worked together for security and personal protection during Hitler's trips and public events, but they operated as two groups and used separate vehicles. [91] By March 1938, both units wore the standard field grey uniform of the SS. [92] The RSD uniform had the SD diamond on the lower left sleeve. [93]

Concentration camps founded

The SS was closely associated with Nazi Germany's concentration camp system. On 26 June 1933, Himmler appointed SS-Oberführer Theodor Eicke as commandant of Dachau concentration camp, one of the first Nazi concentration camps. [94] It was created to consolidate the many small camps that had been set up by various police agencies and the Nazi Party to house political prisoners. [95] The organizational structure Eicke instituted at Dachau stood as the model for all later concentration camps. [96] After 1934, Eicke was named commander of the SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), the SS formation responsible for running the concentration camps under the authority of the SS and Himmler. [97] Known as the "Death's Head Units", the SS-TV was first organized as several battalions, each based at one of Germany's major concentration camps. Leadership at the camps was divided into five departments: commander and adjutant, political affairs division, protective custody, administration, and medical personnel. [98] By 1935, Himmler secured Hitler's approval and the finances necessary to establish and operate additional camps. [99] Six concentration camps [a] housing 21,400 inmates (mostly political prisoners) existed at the start of the war in September 1939. [101] By the end of the war, hundreds of camps of varying size and function had been created, holding nearly 715,000 people, most of whom were targeted by the regime because of their race. [102] [103] The concentration camp population rose in tandem with the defeats suffered by the Nazi regime the worse the catastrophe seemed, the greater the fear of subversion, prompting the SS to intensify their repression and terror. [104]

By the outbreak of World War II, the SS had consolidated into its final form, which comprised three main organizations: the Allgemeine SS, SS-Totenkopfverbände, and the Waffen-SS, which was founded in 1934 as the SS-Verfügungstruppe (SS-VT) and renamed in 1940. [105] [106] The Waffen-SS evolved into a second German army alongside the Wehrmacht and operated in tandem with them, especially with the Heer (German Army). [107] However, it never obtained total "independence of command", nor was it ever a "serious rival" to the German Army. Members were never able to join the ranks of the German High Command and it was dependent on the army for heavy weaponry and equipment. [108] Although SS ranks generally had equivalents in the other services, the SS rank system did not copy the terms and ranks used by the Wehrmacht's branches. Instead, it used the ranks established by the post-World War I Freikorps and the SA. This was primarily done to emphasize the SS as being independent of the Wehrmacht. [109]

Invasion of Poland

In the September 1939 invasion of Poland, the LSSAH and SS-VT fought as separate mobile infantry regiments. [110] The LSSAH became notorious for torching villages without military justification. [111] Members of the LSSAH committed atrocities in numerous towns, including the murder of 50 Polish Jews in Błonie and the massacre of 200 civilians, including children, who were machine-gunned in Złoczew. Shootings also took place in Bolesławiec, Torzeniec, Goworowo, Mława, and Włocławek. [112] Some senior members of the Wehrmacht were not convinced the units were fully prepared for combat. Its units took unnecessary risks and had a higher casualty rate than the army. [113] Generaloberst Fedor von Bock was quite critical following an April 1940 visit of the SS-Totenkopf division, he found their battle training was "insufficient". [114] Hitler thought the criticism was typical of the army's "outmoded conception of chivalry." [115] In its defense, the SS insisted that its armed formations had been hampered by having to fight piecemeal and were improperly equipped by the army. [113]

After the invasion, Hitler entrusted the SS with extermination actions codenamed Operation Tannenberg and AB-Aktion to remove potential leaders who could form a resistance to German occupation. The killings were committed by Einsatzgruppen (task forces deployment groups), assisted by local paramilitary groups. Men for the Einsatzgruppen units were drawn from the SS, the SD, and the police. [116] Some 65,000 Polish civilians, including activists, intelligentsia, scholars, teachers, actors, former officers, and others, were killed by the end of 1939. [117] [118] When the army leadership registered complaints about the brutality being meted out by the Einsatzgruppen, Heydrich informed them that he was acting "in accordance with the special order of the Führer." [119] The first systematic mass shooting of Jews by the Einsatzgruppen took place on 6 September 1939 during the attack on Kraków. [120]

Satisfied with their performance in Poland, Hitler allowed further expansion of the armed SS formations, but insisted new units remain under the operational control of the army. [121] While the SS-Leibstandarte remained an independent regiment functioning as Hitler's personal bodyguards, the other regiments—SS-Deutschland, SS-Germania, and SS-Der Führer—were combined to form the SS-Verfügungs-Division. [122] [113] A second SS division, the SS-Totenkopf, was formed from SS-TV concentration camp guards, and a third, the SS-Polizei, was created from police volunteers. [123] [124] The SS gained control over its own recruitment, logistics, and supply systems for its armed formations at this time. [124] The SS, Gestapo, and SD were in charge of the provisional military administration in Poland until the appointment of Hans Frank as Governor-General on 26 October 1939. [125] [126]

Battle of France

On 10 May 1940, Hitler launched the Battle of France, a major offensive against France and the Low Countries. [127] The SS supplied two of the 89 divisions employed. [128] The LSSAH and elements of the SS-VT participated in the ground invasion of the Battle of the Netherlands. [129] Simultaneously, airborne troops were dropped to capture key Dutch airfields, bridges, and railways. In the five-day campaign, the LSSAH linked up with army units and airborne troops after several clashes with Dutch defenders. [129]

SS troops did not take part in the thrust through the Ardennes and the river Meuse. [129] Instead, the SS-Totenkopf was summoned from the army reserve to fight in support of Generalmajor Erwin Rommel's 7th Panzer Division as they advanced toward the English Channel. [130] On 21 May, the British launched an armored counterattack against the flanks of the 7th Panzer Division and SS-Totenkopf. The Germans then trapped the British and French troops in a huge pocket at Dunkirk. [131] On 27 May, 4 Company, SS-Totenkopf perpetrated the Le Paradis massacre, where 97 men of the 2nd Battalion, Royal Norfolk Regiment were machine-gunned after surrendering, with survivors finished off with bayonets. Two men survived. [132] By 28 May the SS-Leibstandarte had taken Wormhout, 10 miles (16 km) from Dunkirk. There, soldiers of the 2nd Battalion were responsible for the Wormhoudt massacre, where 80 British and French soldiers were murdered after they surrendered. [133] According to historian Charles Sydnor, the "fanatical recklessness in the assault, suicidal defense against enemy attacks, and savage atrocities committed in the face of frustrated objectives" exhibited by the SS-Totenkopf division during the invasion were typical of the SS troops as a whole. [134]

At the close of the campaign, Hitler expressed his pleasure with the performance of the SS-Leibstandarte, telling them: "Henceforth it will be an honor for you, who bear my name, to lead every German attack." [135] The SS-VT was renamed the Waffen-SS in a speech made by Hitler in July 1940. [106] Hitler then authorized the enlistment of "people perceived to be of related stock", as Himmler put it, to expand the ranks. [136] Danes, Dutch, Norwegians, Swedes, and Finns volunteered to fight in the Waffen-SS under the command of German officers. [137] They were brought together to form the new division SS-Wiking. [136] In January 1941, the SS-Verfügungs Division was renamed SS-Reich Division (Motorized), and was renamed as the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich when it was reorganized as a Panzergrenadier division in 1942. [138]

Campaign in the Balkans

In April 1941, the German Army invaded Yugoslavia and Greece. The LSSAH and Das Reich were attached to separate army Panzer corps. Fritz Klingenberg, a company commander in the Das Reich, led his men across Yugoslavia to the capital, Belgrade, where a small group in the vanguard accepted the surrender of the city on 13 April. A few days later Yugoslavia surrendered. [139] [140] SS police units immediately began taking hostages and carrying out reprisals, a practice that became common. In some cases, they were joined by the Wehrmacht. [141] Similar to Poland, the war policies of the Nazis in the Balkans resulted in brutal occupation and racist mass murder. Serbia became the second country (after Estonia) declared Judenfrei (free of Jews). [142]

In Greece, the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS encountered resistance from the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and Greek Army. [143] The fighting was intensified by the mountainous terrain, with its heavily defended narrow passes. The LSSAH was at the forefront of the German push. [144] The BEF evacuated by sea to Crete, but had to flee again in late May when the Germans arrived. [145] Like Yugoslavia, the conquest of Greece brought its Jews into danger, as the Nazis immediately took a variety of measures against them. [146] Initially confined in ghettos, most were transported to Auschwitz concentration camp in March 1943, where they were killed in the gas chambers on arrival. Of Greece's 80,000 Jews, only 20 percent survived the war. [147]

On 22 June 1941, Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. [148] The expanding war and the need to control occupied territories provided the conditions for Himmler to further consolidate the police and military organs of the SS. [149] Rapid acquisition of vast territories in the East placed considerable strain on the SS police organizations as they struggled to adjust to the changing security challenges. [150]

The 1st and 2nd SS Infantry Brigades, which had been formed from surplus concentration camp guards of the SS-TV, and the SS Cavalry Brigade moved into the Soviet Union behind the advancing armies. At first, they fought Soviet partisans, but by the autumn of 1941, they left the anti-partisan role to other units and actively took part in the Holocaust. While assisting the Einsatzgruppen, they formed firing parties that participated in the liquidation of the Jewish population of the Soviet Union. [151] [152]

On 31 July 1941, Göring gave Heydrich written authorization to ensure the cooperation of administrative leaders of various government departments to undertake genocide of the Jews in territories under German control. [153] Heydrich was instrumental in carrying out these exterminations, as the Gestapo was ready to organize deportations in the West and his Einsatzgruppen were already conducting extensive killing operations in the East. [154] On 20 January 1942, Heydrich chaired a meeting, called the Wannsee Conference, to discuss the implementation of the plan. [155]

During battles in the Soviet Union during 1941 and 1942, the Waffen-SS suffered enormous casualties. The LSSAH and Das Reich lost over half their troops to illness and combat casualties. [156] In need of recruits, Himmler began to accept soldiers that did not fit the original SS racial profile. [157] In early 1942, SS-Leibstandarte, SS-Totenkopf, and SS-Das Reich were withdrawn to the West to refit and were converted to Panzergrenadier divisions. [158] The SS-Panzer Corps returned to the Soviet Union in 1943 and participated in the Third Battle of Kharkov in February and March. [159]

The Holocaust

The SS was built on a culture of violence, which was exhibited in its most extreme form by the mass murder of civilians and prisoners of war on the Eastern Front. [160] Augmented by personnel from the Kripo, Orpo (Order Police), and Waffen-SS, [161] the Einsatzgruppen reached a total strength of 3,000 men. Einsatzgruppen A, B, and C were attached to Army Groups North, Centre, and South Einsatzgruppe D was assigned to the 11th Army. The Einsatzgruppe for Special Purposes operated in eastern Poland starting in July 1941. [162] The historian Richard Rhodes describes them as being "outside the bounds of morality" they were "judge, jury and executioner all in one", with the authority to kill anyone at their discretion. [163] Following Operation Barbarossa, these Einsatzgruppen units, together with the Waffen-SS and Order Police as well as with assistance from the Wehrmacht, engaged in the mass killing of the Jewish population in occupied eastern Poland and the Soviet Union. [163] [164] [165] The greatest extent of Einsatzgruppen action occurred in 1941 and 1942 in Ukraine and Russia. [166] Before the invasion there were five million registered Jews throughout the Soviet Union, with three million of those residing in the territories occupied by the Germans by the time the war ended, over two million of these had been murdered. [167]

The extermination activities of the Einsatzgruppen generally followed a standard procedure, with the Einsatzgruppen chief contacting the nearest Wehrmacht unit commander to inform him of the impending action this was done so they could coordinate and control access to the execution grounds. [168] Initially, the victims were shot, but this method proved impracticable for an operation of this scale. [169] Also, after Himmler observed the shooting of 100 Jews at Minsk in August 1941, he grew concerned about the impact such actions were having on the mental health of his SS men. He decided that alternate methods of killing should be found, which led to introduction of gas vans. [170] [171] However, these were not popular with the men, because removing the dead bodies from the van and burying them was a horrible ordeal. Prisoners or auxiliaries were often assigned to do this task so as to spare the SS men the trauma. [172]

Anti-partisan operations

In response to the army's difficulties in dealing with Soviet partisans, Hitler decided in July 1942 to transfer anti-partisan operations to the police. This placed the matter under Himmler's purview. [173] [174] As Hitler had ordered on 8 July 1941 that all Jews were to be regarded as partisans, the term "anti-partisan operations" was used as a euphemism for the murder of Jews as well as actual combat against resistance elements. [175] [176] In July 1942 Himmler ordered that the term "partisan" should no longer be used instead resisters to Nazi rule would be described as "bandits". [177]

Himmler set the SS and SD to work on developing additional anti-partisan tactics and launched a propaganda campaign. [178] Sometime in June 1943, Himmler issued the Bandenbekämpfung (bandit fighting) order, simultaneously announcing the existence of the Bandenkampfverbände (bandit fighting formations), with SS-Obergruppenführer Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski as its chief. Employing troops primarily from the SS police and Waffen-SS, the Bandenkampfverbände had four principal operational components: propaganda, centralized control and coordination of security operations, training of troops, and battle operations. [179] Once the Wehrmacht had secured territorial objectives, the Bandenkampfverbände first secured communications facilities, roads, railways, and waterways. Thereafter, they secured rural communities and economic installations such as factories and administrative buildings. An additional priority was securing agricultural and forestry resources. The SS oversaw the collection of the harvest, which was deemed critical to strategic operations. [180] Any Jews in the area were rounded up and killed. Communists and people of Asiatic descent were killed presumptively under the assumption that they were Soviet agents. [181]

Death camps

After the start of the war, Himmler intensified the activity of the SS within Germany and in Nazi-occupied Europe. Increasing numbers of Jews and German citizens deemed politically suspect or social outsiders were arrested. [182] As the Nazi regime became more oppressive, the concentration camp system grew in size and lethal operation, and grew in scope as the economic ambitions of the SS intensified. [183]

Intensification of the killing operations took place in late 1941 when the SS began construction of stationary gassing facilities to replace the use of Einsatzgruppen for mass killings. [184] [185] Victims at these new extermination camps were killed with the use of carbon monoxide gas from automobile engines. [186] During Operation Reinhard, run by officers from the Totenkopfverbände, who were sworn to secrecy, three death camps were built in occupied Poland: Bełżec (operational by March 1942), Sobibór (operational by May 1942), and Treblinka (operational by July 1942), [187] with squads of Trawniki men (Eastern European collaborators) overseeing hundreds of Sonderkommando prisoners, [b] who were forced to work in the gas chambers and crematoria before being murdered themselves. [188] On Himmler's orders, by early 1942 the concentration camp at Auschwitz was greatly expanded to include the addition of gas chambers, where victims were killed using the pesticide Zyklon B. [189] [190]

For administrative reasons, all concentration camp guards and administrative staff became full members of the Waffen-SS in 1942. The concentration camps were placed under the command of the SS-Wirtschafts-Verwaltungshauptamt (SS Main Economic and Administrative Office WVHA) under Oswald Pohl. [191] Richard Glücks served as the Inspector of Concentration Camps, which in 1942 became office "D" under the WVHA. [192] [193] Exploitation and extermination became a balancing act as the military situation deteriorated. The labor needs of the war economy, especially for skilled workers, meant that some Jews escaped the genocide. [194] On 30 October 1942, due to severe labor shortages in Germany, Himmler ordered that large numbers of able-bodied people in Nazi-occupied Soviet territories be taken prisoner and sent to Germany as forced labor. [195]

By 1944, the SS-TV had been organized into three divisions: staff of the concentration camps in Germany and Austria, in the occupied territories, and of the extermination camps in Poland. By 1944, it became standard practice to rotate SS members in and out of the camps, partly based on manpower needs, but also to provide easier assignments to wounded Waffen-SS members. [196] This rotation of personnel meant that nearly the entire SS knew what was going on inside the concentration camps, making the entire organization liable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. [197]

In 1934, Himmler founded the first SS business venture, Nordland-Verlag, a publishing house that released propaganda material and SS training manuals. Thereafter, he purchased Allach Porcelain, which then began to produce SS memorabilia. [198] Because of the labor shortage and a desire for financial gain, the SS started exploiting concentration camp inmates as slave labor. [199] Most of the SS businesses lost money until Himmler placed them under the administration of Pohl's Verwaltung und Wirtschaftshauptamt Hauptamt (Administration and Business office VuWHA) in 1939. [193] Even then, most of the enterprises were poorly run and did not fare well, as SS men were not selected for their business experience, and the workers were starving. [200] In July 1940 Pohl established the Deutsche Wirtschaftsbetriebe GmbH (German Businesses Ltd DWB), an umbrella corporation under which he took over administration of all SS business concerns. [201] Eventually, the SS founded nearly 200 holding companies for their businesses. [202]

In May 1941 the VuWHA founded the Deutsche Ausrüstungswerke GmbH (German Equipment Works DAW), which was created to integrate the SS business enterprises with the burgeoning concentration camp system. [203] Himmler subsequently established four major new concentration camps in 1941: Auschwitz, Gross-Rosen, Natzweiler-Struthof, and Neuengamme. Each had at least one factory or quarry nearby where the inmates were forced to work. [204] Himmler took a particular interest in providing laborers for IG Farben, which was constructing a synthetic rubber factory at Auschwitz III–Monowitz. [205] The plant was almost ready to commence production when it was overrun by Soviet troops in 1945. [206] The life expectancy of inmates at Monowitz averaged about three months. [207] This was typical of the camps, as inmates were underfed and lived under disastrously bad living conditions. Their workload was intentionally made impossibly high, under the policy of extermination through labor. [208]

In 1942, Himmler consolidated all of the offices for which Pohl was responsible into one, creating the SS Main Economic and Administrative Office (Wirtschafts- und Verwaltungshauptamt WVHA). [191] The entire concentration camp system was placed under the authority of the WVHA. [192] The SS owned Sudetenquell GmbH, a mineral water producer in Sudetenland. By 1944, the SS had purchased 75 percent of the mineral water producers in Germany and were intending to acquire a monopoly. [209] Several concentration camps produced building materials such as stone, bricks, and cement for the SS-owned Deutsche Erd- und Steinwerke (German Earth And Stone Works DEST). [210] In the occupied Eastern territories, the SS acquired a monopoly in brick production by seizing all 300 extant brickworks. [209] The DWB also founded the Ost-Deutsche Baustoffwerke (East German Building Supply Works GmbH or ODBS) and Deutsche Edelmöbel GmbH (German Noble Furniture). These operated in factories the SS had confiscated from Jews and Poles. [211]

The SS owned experimental farms, bakeries, meat packing plants, leather works, clothing and uniform factories, and small arms factories. [212] [213] Under the direction of the WVHA, the SS sold camp labor to various factories at a rate of three to six Reichsmarks per prisoner per day. [214] The SS confiscated and sold the property of concentration camp inmates, confiscated their investment portfolios and their cash, and profited from their dead bodies by selling their hair to make felt and melting down their dental work to obtain gold from the fillings. [215] The total value of assets looted from the victims of Operation Reinhard alone (not including Auschwitz) was listed by Odilo Globocnik as 178,745,960.59 Reichsmarks. Items seized included 2,909.68 kilograms of gold worth 843,802.75 RM, as well as 18,733.69 kg of silver, 1,514 kg of platinum, 249,771.50 American dollars, 130 diamond solitaires, 2,511.87 carats of brilliants, 13,458.62 carats of diamonds, and 114 kg of pearls. [216] According to Nazi legislation, Jewish property belonged to the state, but many SS camp commandants and guards stole items such as diamonds or currency for personal gain or took seized foodstuffs and liquor to sell on the black market. [217]

On 5 July 1943, the Germans launched the Battle of Kursk, an offensive designed to eliminate the Kursk salient. [218] The Waffen-SS by this time had been expanded to 12 divisions, and most took part in the battle. [219] Due to stiff Soviet resistance, Hitler halted the attack by the evening of 12 July. On 17 July he called off the operation and ordered a withdrawal. [220] Thereafter, the Germans were forced onto the defensive as the Red Army began the liberation of Western Russia. [221] The losses incurred by the Waffen-SS and the Wehrmacht during the Battle of Kursk occurred nearly simultaneously with the Allied assault into Italy, opening a two-front war for Germany. [222]

Normandy landings

Alarmed by the raids on St Nazaire and Dieppe in 1942, Hitler had ordered the construction of fortifications he called the Atlantic Wall all along the Atlantic coast, from Spain to Norway, to protect against an expected Allied invasion. [223] Concrete gun emplacements were constructed at strategic points along the coast, and wooden stakes, metal tripods, mines, and large anti-tank obstacles were placed on the beaches to delay the approach of landing craft and impede the movement of tanks. [224] In addition to several static infantry divisions, eleven panzer and Panzergrenadier divisions were deployed nearby. [225] [226] Four of these formations were Waffen-SS divisions. [227] In addition, the SS-Das Reich was located in Southern France, the LSSAH was in Belgium refitting after fighting in the Soviet Union, and the newly formed panzer division SS-Hitlerjugend, consisting of 17- and 18-year-old Hitler Youth members supported by combat veterans and experienced NCOs, was stationed west of Paris. [228] The creation of the SS-Hitlerjugend was a sign of Hitler's desperation for more troops, especially ones with unquestioning obedience. [229]

The Normandy landings took place beginning 6 June 1944. 21st Panzer Division under Generalmajor Edgar Feuchtinger, positioned south of Caen, was the only panzer division close to the beaches. The division included 146 tanks and 50 assault guns, plus supporting infantry and artillery. [230] At 02:00, Generalleutnant Wilhelm Richter, commander of the 716th Static Infantry Division, ordered 21st Panzer Division into position to counter-attack. However, as the division was part of the armored reserve, Feuchtinger was obliged to seek clearance from OKW before he could commit his formation. [231] Feuchtinger did not receive orders until nearly 09:00, but in the meantime, on his own initiative he put together a battle group (including tanks) to fight the British forces east of the Orne. [232] SS-Hitlerjugend began to deploy in the afternoon of 6 June, with its units undertaking defensive actions the following day. They also took part in the Battle for Caen (June–August 1944). [233] On 7–8 and 17 June, members of the SS-Hitlerjugend shot and killed twenty Canadian prisoners of war in the Ardenne Abbey massacre. [234]

The Allies continued to make progress in the liberation of France, and on 4 August Hitler ordered a counter-offensive (Operation Lüttich) from Vire towards Avranches. [235] The operation included LSSAH, Das Reich, 2nd, and 116th Panzer Divisions, with support from infantry and elements of the 17th SS Panzergrenadier Division Götz von Berlichingen under SS-Oberstgruppenführer Paul Hausser. These forces were to mount an offensive near Mortain and drive west through Avranches to the coast. The Allied forces were prepared for this offensive, and an air assault on the combined German units proved devastating. [236] On 21 August, 50,000 German troops, including most of the LSSAH, were encircled by the Allies in the Falaise Pocket. [237] Remnants of the LSSAH which escaped were withdrawn to Germany for refitting. [238] Paris was liberated on 25 August, and the last of the German forces withdrew over the Seine by the end of August, ending the Normandy campaign. [239]

Battle for Germany

Waffen-SS units that had survived the summer campaigns were withdrawn from the front line to refit. Two of them, the 9th SS and 10th SS Panzer Divisions, did so in the Arnhem region of Holland in early September 1944. Coincidentally, on 17 September, the Allies launched in the same area Operation Market Garden, a combined airborne and land operation designed to seize control of the lower Rhine. [240] The 9th and 10th Panzers were among the units that repulsed the attack. [241]

In December 1944, Hitler launched the Ardennes Offensive, also known as the Battle of the Bulge, a significant counterattack against the western Allies through the Ardennes with the aim of reaching Antwerp while encircling the Allied armies in the area. [242] The offensive began with an artillery barrage shortly before dawn on 16 December. Spearheading the attack were two panzer armies composed largely of Waffen-SS divisions. [243] The battlegroups found advancing through the forests and wooded hills of the Ardennes difficult in the winter weather, but they initially made good progress in the northern sector. They soon encountered strong resistance from the US 2nd and 99th Infantry Divisions. By 23 December, the weather improved enough for Allied air forces to attack the German forces and their supply columns, causing fuel shortages. In increasingly difficult conditions, the German advance slowed and was stopped. [244] Hitler's failed offensive cost 700 tanks and most of their remaining mobile forces in the west, [245] as well as most of their irreplaceable reserves of manpower and materiel. [246]

During the battle, SS-Obersturmbannführer Joachim Peiper left a path of destruction, which included Waffen-SS soldiers under his command murdering American POWs and unarmed Belgian civilians in the Malmedy massacre. [247] Captured SS soldiers who were part of Kampfgruppe Peiper were tried during the Malmedy massacre trial following the war for this massacre and several others in the area. Many of the perpetrators were sentenced to hang, but the sentences were commuted. Peiper was imprisoned for eleven years for his role in the killings. [248]

In the east, the Red Army resumed its offensive on 12 January 1945. German forces were outnumbered twenty to one in aircraft, eleven to one in infantry, and seven to one in tanks on the Eastern Front. [249] By the end of the month, the Red Army had made bridgeheads across the Oder, the last geographic obstacle before Berlin. [250] The western Allies continued to advance as well, but not as rapidly as the Red Army. [251] The Panzer Corps conducted a successful defensive operation on 17–24 February at the Hron River, stalling the Allied advance towards Vienna. [252] The 1st and 2nd SS Panzer Corps made their way towards Austria, but were slowed by damaged railways. [253]

Budapest fell on 13 February. [254] Hitler ordered Dietrich's 6th Panzer Army to move into Hungary to protect the Nagykanizsa oilfields and refineries, which he deemed the most strategically valuable fuel reserves on the Eastern Front. [255] [252] Frühlingserwachsen (Operation Spring Awakening), the final German offensive in the east, took place in early March. German forces attacked near Lake Balaton, with 6th Panzer Army advancing north towards Budapest and 2nd Panzer Army moving east and south. [256] Dietrich's forces at first made good progress, but as they drew near the Danube, the combination of muddy terrain and strong Soviet resistance brought them to a halt. [257] By 16 March the battle was lost. [258] Enraged by the defeat, Hitler ordered the Waffen-SS units involved to remove their cuff titles as a mark of disgrace. Dietrich refused to carry out the order. [259]

By this time, on both the Eastern and Western Front, the activities of the SS were becoming clear to the Allies, as the concentration and extermination camps were being overrun. [260] Allied troops were filled with disbelief and repugnance at the evidence of Nazi brutality in the camps. [261]

On 9 April 1945 Königsberg fell to the Red Army, and on 13 April Dietrich's SS unit was forced out of Vienna. [262] The Battle of Berlin began at 03:30 on 16 April with a massive artillery barrage. [263] Within the week, fighting was taking place inside the city. Among the many elements defending Berlin were French, Latvian, and Scandinavian Waffen-SS troops. [264] [265] Hitler, now living in the Führerbunker under the Reich Chancellery, still hoped that his remaining SS soldiers could rescue the capital. In spite of the hopelessness of the situation, members of the SS patrolling the city continued to shoot or hang soldiers and civilians for what they considered to be acts of cowardice or defeatism. [266] The Berlin garrison surrendered on 2 May, two days after Hitler committed suicide. [263] As members of SS expected little mercy from the Red Army, they attempted to move westward to surrender to the western Allies instead. [267]

Reich Security Main Office

Heydrich held the title of Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD (Chief of the Security Police and SD) until 27 September 1939, when he became chief of the newly established Reich Security Main Office (RSHA). [65] [268] From that point forward, the RSHA was in charge of SS security services. It had under its command the SD, Kripo, and Gestapo, as well as several offices to handle finance, administration, and supply. [65] Heinrich Müller, who had been chief of operations for the Gestapo, was appointed Gestapo chief at this time. [269] Arthur Nebe was chief of the Kripo, and the two branches of SD were commanded by a series of SS officers, including Otto Ohlendorf and Walter Schellenberg. The SD was considered an elite branch of the SS, and its members were better educated and typically more ambitious than those within the ranks of the Allgemeine SS. [48] Members of the SD were specially trained in criminology, intelligence, and counter-intelligence. They also gained a reputation for ruthlessness and unwavering commitment to Nazi ideology. [270]

Heydrich was attacked in Prague on 27 May 1942 by a British-trained team of Czech and Slovak soldiers who had been sent by the Czechoslovak government-in-exile to kill him in Operation Anthropoid. He died from his injuries a week later. [271] [c] Himmler ran the RSHA personally until 30 January 1943, when Heydrich's positions were taken over by Ernst Kaltenbrunner. [273]


Beginning in 1938 and throughout World War II, the SS enacted a procedure where offices and units of the SS could form smaller sub-units, known as SS-Sonderkommandos, to carry out special tasks, including large-scale murder operations. The use of SS-Sonderkommandos was widespread. According to former SS Sturmbannführer Wilhelm Höttl, not even the SS leadership knew how many SS-Sonderkommandos were constantly being formed, disbanded, and reformed for various tasks, especially on the Eastern Front. [274]

An SS-Sonderkommando unit led by SS-Sturmbannführer Herbert Lange murdered 1,201 psychiatric patients at the Tiegenhof psychiatric hospital in the Free City of Danzig, [275] 1,100 patients in Owińska, 2,750 patients at Kościan, and 1,558 patients at Działdowo, as well as hundreds of Poles at Fort VII, where the mobile gas van and gassing bunker were developed. [276] [277] In 1941–42, SS-Sonderkommando Lange set up and managed the first extermination camp, at Chełmno, where 152,000 Jews were killed using gas vans. [278]

After the Battle of Stalingrad in February 1943, Himmler realized that Germany would likely lose the war, and ordered the formation of Sonderkommando 1005, a special task force under SS-Standartenführer Paul Blobel. The unit's assignment was to visit mass graves on the Eastern Front to exhume bodies and burn them in an attempt to cover up the genocide. The task remained unfinished at the end of the war, and many mass graves remain unmarked and unexcavated. [279]

The Eichmann Sonderkommando was a task force headed by Adolf Eichmann that arrived in Budapest on 19 March 1944, the same day that Axis forces invaded Hungary. Their task was to take a direct role in the deportation of Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz. The SS-Sonderkommandos enlisted the aid of antisemitic elements from the Hungarian gendarmerie and pro-German administrators from within the Hungarian Interior Ministry. [280] Round-ups began on 16 April, and from 14 May, four trains of 3,000 Jews per day left Hungary and traveled to the camp at Auschwitz II-Birkenau, arriving along a newly built spur line that terminated a few hundred meters from the gas chambers. [281] [282] Between 10 and 25 percent of the people on each train were chosen as forced laborers the rest were killed within hours of arrival. [281] [283] Under international pressure, the Hungarian government halted deportations on 6 July 1944, by which time over 437,000 of Hungary's 725,000 Jews had died. [281] [284]


The Einsatzgruppen had its origins in the ad hoc Einsatzkommando formed by Heydrich following the Anschluss in Austria in March 1938. [285] Two units of Einsatzgruppen were stationed in the Sudetenland in October 1938. When military action turned out not to be necessary because of the Munich Agreement, the Einsatzgruppen were assigned to confiscate government papers and police documents. They secured government buildings, questioned senior civil servants, and arrested as many as 10,000 Czech communists and German citizens. [285] [286] The Einsatzgruppen also followed Wehrmacht troops and killed potential partisans. [287] Similar groups were used in 1939 for the occupation of Czechoslovakia. [288]

Hitler felt that the planned extermination of the Jews was too difficult and important to be entrusted to the military. [289] In 1941 the Einsatzgruppen were sent into the Soviet Union to begin large-scale genocide of Jews, Romani people, and communists. [290] Historian Raul Hilberg estimates that between 1941 and 1945 the Einsatzgruppen and related agencies killed more than two million people, including 1.3 million Jews. [291] The largest mass shooting perpetrated by the Einsatzgruppen was at Babi Yar outside Kiev, where 33,771 Jews were killed in a single operation on 29–30 September 1941. [292] In the Rumbula massacre (November–December 1941), 25,000 victims from the Riga ghetto were killed. [293] Another mass shooting early in 1942 claimed the lives of over 10,000 Jews in Kharkov. [294]

The last Einsatzgruppen were disbanded in mid-1944 (although some continued to exist on paper until 1945) due to the German retreat on both fronts and the consequent inability to continue extermination activities. Former Einsatzgruppen members were either assigned duties in the Waffen-SS or concentration camps. Twenty-four Einsatzgruppen commanders were tried for war crimes following the war. [295]

SS Court Main Office

The SS Court Main Office (Hauptamt SS-Gericht) was an internal legal system for conducting investigations, trials, and punishment of the SS and police. It had more than 600 lawyers on staff in the main offices in Berlin and Munich. Proceedings were conducted at 38 regional SS courts throughout Germany. It was the only authority authorized to try SS personnel, except for SS members who were on active duty in the Wehrmacht (in such cases, the SS member in question was tried by a standard military tribunal). Its creation placed the SS beyond the reach of civilian legal authority. Himmler personally intervened as he saw fit regarding convictions and punishment. [296] The historian Karl Dietrich Bracher describes this court system as one factor in the creation of the Nazi totalitarian police state, as it removed objective legal procedures, rendering citizens defenseless against the "summary justice of the SS terror." [297]

SS Cavalry

Shortly after Hitler seized power in 1933, most horse riding associations were taken over by the SA and SS. [298] Members received combat training to serve in the Reiter-SS (SS Cavalry Corps). [299] The first SS cavalry regiment, designated SS-Totenkopf Reitstandarte 1, was formed in September 1939. Commanded by then SS-Standartenführer Hermann Fegelein, the unit was assigned to Poland, where they took part in the extermination of Polish intelligentsia. [300] [301] Additional squadrons were added in May 1940, for a total of fourteen. [302]

The unit was split into two regiments in December 1939, with Fegelein in charge of both. By March 1941 their strength was 3,500 men. [303] [304] In July 1941, they were assigned to the Pripyat swamps punitive operation, tasked with rounding up and exterminating Jews and partisans. [305] The two regiments were amalgamated into the SS Cavalry Brigade on 31 July, twelve days after the operation started. [306] Fegelein's final report, dated 18 September 1941, states that they killed 14,178 Jews, 1,001 partisans, and 699 Red Army soldiers, with 830 prisoners taken. [307] [308] The historian Henning Pieper estimates the actual number of Jews killed was closer to 23,700. [309] The SS Cavalry Brigade took serious losses in November 1941 in the Battle of Moscow, with casualties of up to 60 percent in some squadrons. [310] Fegelein was appointed as commander of the 8th SS Cavalry Division Florian Geyer on 20 April 1943. This unit saw service in the Soviet Union in attacks on partisans and civilians. [311] [312] In addition, SS Cavalry regiments served in Croatia and Hungary. [313]

SS Medical Corps

The SS Medical Corps were initially known as the Sanitätsstaffel (sanitary units). After 1931, the SS formed the headquarters office Amt V as the central office for SS medical units. An SS medical academy was established in Berlin in 1938 to train Waffen-SS physicians. [314] SS medical personnel did not often provide actual medical care their primary responsibility was medicalized genocide. [315] At Auschwitz, about three-quarters of new arrivals, including almost all children, women with small children, all the elderly, and all those who appeared on brief and superficial inspection by an SS doctor not to be completely fit were killed within hours of arrival. [316] In their role as Desinfektoren (disinfectors), SS doctors also made selections among existing prisoners as to their fitness to work and supervised the killing of those deemed unfit. Inmates in deteriorating health were examined by SS doctors, who decided whether or not they would be able to recover in less than two weeks. Those too ill or injured to recover in that time frame were killed. [317]

At Auschwitz, the actual delivery of gas to the victims was always handled by the SS, on the order of the supervising SS doctor. [318] [319] Many of the SS doctors also conducted inhumane medical experiments on camp prisoners. [320] The most infamous SS doctor, Josef Mengele, served as a medical officer at Auschwitz under the command of Eduard Wirths of the camp's medical corps. [321] Mengele undertook selections even when he was not assigned to do so in the hope of finding subjects for his experiments. [322] He was particularly interested in locating sets of twins. [323] In contrast to most of the doctors, who viewed undertaking selections as one of their most stressful and horrible duties, Mengele undertook the task with a flamboyant air, often smiling or whistling a tune. [324] [325] After the war, many SS doctors were charged with war crimes for their inhumane medical experiments and for their role in gas chamber selections. [326]

Other SS units


The Ahnenerbe (Ancestral Heritage Organization) was founded in 1935 by Himmler, and became part of the SS in 1939. [327] It was an umbrella agency for more than fifty organizations tasked with studying the German racial identity and ancient Germanic traditions and language. [327] [328] The agency sponsored archaeological expeditions in Germany, Scandinavia, the Middle East, Tibet, and elsewhere to search for evidence of Aryan roots, influence, and superiority. [329] Further planned expeditions were postponed indefinitely at the start of the war. [330]


The SS-Frauenkorps was an auxiliary reporting and clerical unit, [331] which included the SS-Helferinnenkorps (Women Helper Corps), made up of female volunteers. Members were assigned as administrative staff and supply personnel and served in command positions and as guards at women's concentration camps. [332] [333] While female concentration and extermination camp guards were civilian employees of the SS, the SS-Helferinnen who completed training at the Reichsschule für SS-Helferinnen in Oberehnheim (Alsace) were members of the Waffen-SS. [334] Like their male equivalents in the SS, females participated in atrocities against Jews, Poles, and others. [335]

In 1942, Himmler set up the Reichsschule für SS Helferinnen (Reich school for SS helpers) in Oberehnheim to train women in communications so that they could free up men for combat roles. Himmler also intended to replace all female civilian employees in his service with SS-Helferinnen members, as they were selected and trained according to Nazi ideology. [336] [337] The school was closed on 22 November 1944 due to the Allied advance. [338]


The SS-Mannschaften (Auxiliary-SS) were not considered regular SS members, but were conscripted from other branches of the German military, the Nazi Party, SA, and the Volkssturm for service in concentration camps and extermination camps. [339]

Beginning in 1940, Himmler opened up Waffen-SS recruiting to ethnic Germans that were not German citizens. [340] In March 1941, the SS Main Office established the Germanische Leitstelle (Germanic Guidance Office) to establish Waffen-SS recruiting offices in Nazi-occupied Europe. [341] The majority of the resulting foreign Waffen-SS units wore a distinctive national collar patch and preceded their SS rank titles with the prefix Waffen instead of SS. Volunteers from Scandinavian countries filled the ranks of two divisions, the SS-Wiking and SS-Nordland. [342] Swiss German speakers joined in substantial numbers. [343] Belgian Flemings joined Dutchmen to form the SS-Nederland legion, [344] and their Walloon compatriots joined the SS-Wallonien. [345] By the end of 1943 about a quarter of the SS were ethnic Germans from across Europe, [346] and by June 1944, half the Waffen-SS were foreign nationals. [347]

Additional Waffen-SS units were added from the Ukrainians, Albanians from Kosovo, Serbians, Croatians, Turkic, Caucasians, Cossack, and Tatars. The Ukrainians and Tatars, who had suffered persecution under Stalin, were likely motivated primarily by opposition to the Soviet government rather than ideological agreement with the SS. [348] The exiled Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Amin al-Husseini was made an SS-Gruppenführer by Himmler in May 1943. [349] He subsequently used antisemitism and anti-Serb racism to recruit a Waffen-SS division of Bosnian Muslims, the SS-Handschar. [350] The year-long Soviet occupation of the Baltic states at the beginning of World War II resulted in volunteers for Latvian and Estonian Waffen-SS units. The Estonian Legion had 1,280 volunteers under training by the end of 1942. [351] Approximately 25,000 men served in the Estonian SS division, with thousands more conscripted into Police Front battalions and border guard units. [352] Most of the Estonians were fighting primarily to regain their independence and as many as 15,000 of them died fighting alongside the Germans. [353] In early 1944, Himmler even contacted Pohl to suggest releasing Muslim prisoners from concentration camps to supplement his SS troops. [354]

The Indian Legion was a Wehrmacht unit formed in August 1942 chiefly from disaffected Indian soldiers of the British Indian Army captured in the North African Campaign. In August 1944 it was transferred to the auspices of the Waffen-SS as the Indische Freiwilligen-Legion der Waffen-SS. [355] There was also a French volunteer division, SS-Charlemagne, which was formed in 1944 mainly from the remnants of the Legion of French Volunteers Against Bolshevism and French Sturmbrigade. [356]

The SS established its own symbolism, rituals, customs, ranks, and uniforms to set itself apart from other organizations. Before 1929, the SS wore the same brown uniform as the SA, with the addition of a black tie and a black cap with a Totenkopf (death's head) skull and bones symbol, moving to an all-black uniform in 1932. [14] [357] In 1935, the SS combat formations adopted a service uniform in field grey for everyday wear. The SS also developed its own field uniforms, which included reversible smocks and helmet covers printed with camouflage patterns. [358] Uniforms were manufactured in hundreds of licensed factories, with some workers being prisoners of war performing forced labor. Many were produced in concentration camps. [359]

Hitler and the Nazi Party understood the power of emblems and insignia to influence public opinion. [360] The stylized lightning bolt logo of the SS was chosen in 1932. The logo is a pair of runes from a set of 18 Armanen runes created by Guido von List in 1906. It is similar to the ancient Sowilō rune, which symbolizes the sun, but was renamed as "Sig" (victory) in List's iconography. [360] The Totenkopf symbolized the wearer's willingness to fight unto the death, and also served to frighten the enemy. [361]

After 1933 a career in the SS became increasingly attractive to Germany's social elite, who began joining the movement in great numbers, usually motivated by political opportunism. By 1938 about one-third of the SS leadership were members of the upper middle class. The trend reversed after the first Soviet counter-offensive of 1942. [362]

Year Membership Reichsführer-SS
1925 200 [9] Julius Schreck [363]
1926 200 [364] Joseph Berchtold [365]
1927 200 [364] Erhard Heiden [364]
1928 280 [366] Erhard Heiden [364]
1929 1,000 [367] Heinrich Himmler [368]
1930–33 52,000 [9]
(the bandwagon effect) [369]
Heinrich Himmler [368] (establishment of the Third Reich) [370]
1934–39 240,000 [371] Heinrich Himmler [368]
1940–44 800,000 [372] Heinrich Himmler [368]
1944–45 Unknown Heinrich Himmler [368] and Karl Hanke [373]

By 1942 all activities of the SS were managed through twelve main offices. [374] [375]

The term "Austrian SS" is often used to describe that portion of the SS membership from Austria, but it was never a recognized branch of the SS. In contrast to SS members from other countries, who were grouped into either the Germanic-SS or the Foreign Legions of the Waffen-SS, Austrian SS members were regular SS personnel. It was technically under the command of the SS in Germany but often acted independently concerning Austrian affairs. The Austrian SS was founded in 1930 and by 1934 was acting as a covert force to bring about the Anschluss with Germany, which occurred in March 1938. Early Austrian SS leaders were Kaltenbrunner and Arthur Seyss-Inquart. [376] Austrian SS members served in every branch of the SS. Political scientist David Art of Tufts University notes that Austrians constituted 8 percent of the Third Reich's population and 13 percent of the SS he states that 40 percent of the staff and 75 percent of commanders at death camps were Austrian. [377]

After the Anschluss, the Austrian SS was folded into SS-Oberabschnitt Donau. The third regiment of the SS-Verfügungstruppe (Der Führer) and the fourth Totenkopf regiment (Ostmark) were recruited in Austria shortly thereafter. On Heydrich's orders, mass arrests of potential enemies of the Reich began immediately after the Anschluss. [378] Mauthausen was the first concentration camp opened in Austria following the Anschluss. [379] Before the invasion of the Soviet Union, Mauthausen was the harshest of the camps in the Greater German Reich. [380]

The Hotel Metropole was transformed into Gestapo headquarters in Vienna in April 1938. With a staff of 900 (80 percent of whom were recruited from the Austrian police), it was the largest Gestapo office outside Berlin. An estimated 50,000 people were interrogated or tortured there. [381] The Gestapo in Vienna was headed by Franz Josef Huber, who also served as chief of the Central Agency for Jewish Emigration in Vienna. Although its de facto leaders were Adolf Eichmann and later Alois Brunner, Huber was nevertheless responsible for the mass deportation of Austrian Jews. [382]

Following Nazi Germany's collapse, the SS ceased to exist. [383] Numerous members of the SS, many of them still committed Nazis, remained at large in Germany and across Europe. [384] On 21 May 1945, the British captured Himmler, who was in disguise and using a false passport. At an internment camp near Lüneburg, he committed suicide by biting down on a cyanide capsule. [385] Several other leading members of the SS fled, but some were quickly captured. Kaltenbrunner, chief of the RSHA and the highest-ranking surviving SS main department chief upon Himmler's suicide, was captured and arrested in the Bavarian Alps. [386] He was among the 22 defendants put on trial at the International Military Tribunal in 1945–46. [387]

Some SS members were subject to summary execution, torture, and beatings at the hands of freed prisoners, displaced persons, or Allied soldiers. [388] [389] American soldiers of the 157th Regiment, who entered the concentration camp at Dachau in April 1945 and saw the human deprivation and cruelty committed by the SS, shot some of the remaining SS camp guards. [390] On 15 April 1945, British troops entered Bergen-Belsen. They placed the SS guards on starvation rations, made them work without breaks, forced them to deal with the remaining corpses, and stabbed them with bayonets or struck them with their rifle butts if they slowed their pace. [391] Some members of the US Army Counter Intelligence Corps delivered captured SS camp guards to displaced person camps, where they knew they would be subject to summary execution. [392]

International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg

The Allies commenced legal proceedings against captured Nazis, establishing the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945. [393] The first war crimes trial of 24 prominent figures such as Hermann Göring, Albert Speer, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, and Kaltenbrunner took place beginning in November 1945. They were accused of four counts: conspiracy, waging a war of aggression, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in violation of international law. [393] Twelve received the death penalty, including Kaltenbrunner, who was convicted of crimes against humanity and executed on 16 October 1946. [394] The former commandant at Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss, who testified on behalf of Kaltenbrunner and others, was tried and executed in 1947. [395]

Additional SS trials and convictions followed. [396] Many defendants attempted to exculpate themselves using the excuse that they were merely following superior orders, which they had to obey unconditionally as part of their sworn oath and duty. The courts did not find this to be a legitimate defense. [397] A trial of 40 SS officers and guards from Auschwitz took place in Kraków in November 1947. Most were found guilty, and 23 received the death penalty. [398] In addition to those tried by the Western allies, an estimated 37,000 members of the SS were tried and convicted in Soviet courts. Sentences included hangings and long terms of hard labor. [399] Piotr Cywiński, the director of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, estimates that of the 70,000 members of the SS involved in crimes in concentration camps, only about 1,650 to 1,700 were tried after the war. [400] The International Military Tribunal declared the SS a criminal organization in 1946. [401]


After the war, many former Nazis fled to South America, especially to Argentina, where they were welcomed by Juan Perón's regime. [402] In the 1950s, former Dachau inmate Lothar Hermann discovered that Buenos Aires resident Ricardo Klement was, in fact, Adolf Eichmann, who had in 1948 obtained false identification and a landing permit for Argentina through an organization directed by Bishop Alois Hudal, an Austrian cleric with Nazi sympathies, then residing in Italy. [403] Eichmann was captured in Buenos Aires on 11 May 1960 by Mossad, the Israel I intelligence agency. At his trial in Jerusalem in 1961, he was found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging. Eichmann was quoted as having stated, "I will jump into my grave laughing because the fact that I have the death of five million Jews [or Reich enemies, as he later claimed to have said] on my conscience gives me extraordinary satisfaction." [404] Franz Stangl, the commandant of Treblinka, also escaped to South America with the assistance of Hudal's network. He was deported to Germany in 1967 and was sentenced to life in prison in 1970. He died in 1971. [405]

Mengele, worried that his capture would mean a death sentence, fled Germany on 17 April 1949. [406] Assisted by a network of former SS members, he traveled to Genoa, where he obtained a passport under the alias "Helmut Gregor" from the International Committee of the Red Cross. He sailed to Argentina in July. [407] Aware that he was still a wanted man, he moved to Paraguay in 1958 and Brazil in 1960. In both instances he was assisted by former Luftwaffe pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel. [408] Mengele suffered a stroke while swimming and drowned in 1979. [409]

Thousands of Nazis, including former SS members such as Trawniki guard Jakob Reimer and Circassian collaborator Tscherim Soobzokov, fled to the United States under the guise of refugees, sometimes using forged documents. [410] Other SS men, such as Soobzokov, SD officer Wilhelm Höttl, Eichmann aide Otto von Bolschwing, and accused war criminal Theodor Saevecke, were employed by American intelligence agencies against the Soviets. As CIA officer Harry Rositzke noted, "It was a visceral business of using any bastard so long as he was anti-Communist . The eagerness or desire to enlist collaborators means that sure, you didn't look at their credentials too closely." [411] Similarly, the Soviets used SS personnel after the war Operation Theo, for instance, disseminated "subversive rumours" in Allied-occupied Germany. [412]

Simon Wiesenthal and others have speculated about the existence of a Nazi fugitive network code-named ODESSA (an acronym for Organisation der ehemaligen SS-Angehörigen, Organization of former SS members) that allegedly helped war criminals find refuge in Latin America. [413] British writer Gitta Sereny, who conducted interviews with SS men, considers the story untrue and attributes the escapes to postwar chaos and Hudal's Vatican-based network. While the existence of ODESSA remains unproven, Sereny notes that "there certainly were various kinds of Nazi aid organizations after the war — it would have been astonishing if there hadn't been." [414]

  1. ^Buchenwald, Dachau, Flossenbürg, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück, and Sachsenhausen. [100]
  2. ^ Not to be confused with SS-Sonderkommandos, ad hoc SS units that used the same name.
  3. ^ In an act of reprisal, upwards of 10,000 Czechs were arrested 1,300 were shot, including all male inhabitants from the nearby town of Lidice (where Heydrich's assassins had supposedly been harbored), and the town was razed. [272]
  1. ^ abWeale 2010, p. 26.
  2. ^McNab 2009, p. 137.
  3. ^ abEvans 2008, p. 318.
  4. ^Evans 2003, p. 228.
  5. ^Michael & Doerr 2002, p. 356.
  6. ^McNab 2009, pp. 14, 16.
  7. ^McNab 2009, p. 14.
  8. ^Weale 2010, p. 16.
  9. ^ abcMcNab 2009, p. 16.
  10. ^Hein 2015, p. 10.
  11. ^Weale 2010, pp. 26–29.
  12. ^Koehl 2004, p. 34.
  13. ^Cook & Bender 1994, pp. 17, 19.
  14. ^ abLaqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 604.
  15. ^Weale 2010, p. 30.
  16. ^ abWeale 2010, p. 32.
  17. ^Hein 2015, p. 12.
  18. ^ abWeale 2010, pp. 45–46.
  19. ^Weale 2010, pp. 32–33.
  20. ^Miller & Schulz 2012, pp. 1–2.
  21. ^McNab 2009, p. 18.
  22. ^Weale 2010, p. 47.
  23. ^Longerich 2012, p. 113.
  24. ^ abBurleigh & Wippermann 1991, pp. 272–273.
  25. ^Weale 2010, pp. 45–47, 300–305.
  26. ^Miller & Schulz 2012, pp. 2–3.
  27. ^Kershaw 2008, pp. 308–314.
  28. ^Baranowski 2010, pp. 196–197.
  29. ^Zentner & Bedürftig 1991, p. 901.
  30. ^Zentner & Bedürftig 1991, p. 903.
  31. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 606.
  32. ^Allen 2002, p. 112.
  33. ^Höhne 2001, pp. 146, 147.
  34. ^Stackelberg 2002, p. 116.
  35. ^ abJacobsen 1999, pp. 82, 93.
  36. ^Weale 2010, pp. 62–67.
  37. ^Weale 2010, pp. 63–65.
  38. ^Langerbein 2003, p. 19.
  39. ^Yenne 2010, p. 115.
  40. ^Höhne 2001, pp. 148–149.
  41. ^Weale 2010, pp. 65–66.
  42. ^Höhne 2001, pp. 150–151.
  43. ^Yenne 2010, p. 93.
  44. ^Yenne 2010, p. 94.
  45. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 608.
  46. ^Yenne 2010, pp. 111–113.
  47. ^Himmler 1936.
  48. ^ abLangerbein 2003, p. 21.
  49. ^Himmler 1936, p. 134.
  50. ^Weale 2012, pp. 60–61.
  51. ^ abcRummel 1992, pp. 12–13.
  52. ^Rummel 1992, p. 12.
  53. ^International Military Tribunal 1946.
  54. ^ abWilliams 2001, p. 77.
  55. ^ abBuchheim 1968, p. 157.
  56. ^Hein 2015, pp. 66–71.
  57. ^Evans 2005, p. 54.
  58. ^Williams 2001, p. 61.
  59. ^Hildebrand 1984, pp. 13–14.
  60. ^Kershaw 2008, pp. 313, 316.
  61. ^McNab 2009, pp. 9, 17, 26–27, 30, 46–47.
  62. ^Reitlinger 1989, p. 90.
  63. ^Dear & Foot 1995, pp. 814–815.
  64. ^Longerich 2012, p. 204.
  65. ^ abcLongerich 2012, p. 470.
  66. ^Hein 2015, pp. 70–71.
  67. ^Read 2005, pp. 512–514.
  68. ^Evans 2005, p. 584.
  69. ^ abRead 2005, p. 515.
  70. ^Evans 2005, p. 590.
  71. ^Evans 2005, p. 591.
  72. ^Hildebrand 1984, pp. 61–62.
  73. ^Weale 2010, p. 85.
  74. ^Hildebrand 1984, p. 61.
  75. ^Koehl 2004, pp. 144, 148, 169, 176–177.
  76. ^McNab 2009, p. 165.
  77. ^Spielvogel 1992, pp. 102–108.
  78. ^Cook & Bender 1994, pp. 8, 9.
  79. ^Cook & Bender 1994, pp. 9, 12, 17–19.
  80. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 157, 160, 165.
  81. ^Hoffmann 2000, p. 166.
  82. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 181–186.
  83. ^Cook & Bender 1994, pp. 17–19.
  84. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 157, 160, 165, 166, 181–186.
  85. ^Cook & Bender 1994, pp. 19, 33.
  86. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 32, 48, 57.
  87. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 36–48.
  88. ^Joachimsthaler 1999, p. 288.
  89. ^Hoffmann 2000, p. 32.
  90. ^ abHoffmann 2000, p. 36.
  91. ^Felton 2014, pp. 32–33.
  92. ^Hoffmann 2000, pp. 36, 48.
  93. ^Felton 2014, p. 18.
  94. ^Padfield 2001, pp. 128–129.
  95. ^Weale 2010, p. 95.
  96. ^Evans 2005, p. 85.
  97. ^Hilberg 1985, p. 222.
  98. ^Hein 2015, p. 63.
  99. ^Wachsmann 2010, p. 22.
  100. ^Weale 2010, pp. 106–108.
  101. ^Weale 2010, p. 108.
  102. ^Evans 2008, pp. 366–367.
  103. ^Weale 2010, pp. 108–109.
  104. ^Ayçoberry 1999, p. 273.
  105. ^Stein 2002, p. 23.
  106. ^ abFlaherty 2004, p. 156.
  107. ^Stein 2002, pp. 285–287.
  108. ^Stein 2002, pp. 18, 287.
  109. ^Mollo 1991, pp. 1–3.
  110. ^Stein 2002, p. 27.
  111. ^Butler 2001, p. 45.
  112. ^Rossino 2003, pp. 114, 159–161.
  113. ^ abcFlaherty 2004, p. 149.
  114. ^Hein 2015, p. 82.
  115. ^Stone 2011, p. 127.
  116. ^Longerich 2010, pp. 144–145.
  117. ^Evans 2008, pp. 14–15.
  118. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 109–111.
  119. ^Kershaw 2001, p. 246.
  120. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. xxxi.
  121. ^Reynolds 1997, pp. 6, 7.
  122. ^Stein 2002, p. 32.
  123. ^Stein 2002, pp. 33–35.
  124. ^ abMcNab 2009, p. 66.
  125. ^Hildebrand 1984, p. 50.
  126. ^Weale 2010, p. 229.
  127. ^Hellwinkel 2014, p. 9.
  128. ^Reitlinger 1989, p. 147.
  129. ^ abcStein 2002, p. 61.
  130. ^Butler 2003, p. 64.
  131. ^Manning 1999, p. 59.
  132. ^Sydnor 1977, p. 93.
  133. ^Weale 2012, p. 251.
  134. ^Sydnor 1977, p. 102.
  135. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 143.
  136. ^ abStein 2002, pp. 150, 153.
  137. ^Koehl 2004, pp. 213–214.
  138. ^Mattson 2002, pp. 77, 104.
  139. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 162, 163.
  140. ^Weale 2012, p. 297.
  141. ^Bessel 2006, pp. 110–111.
  142. ^Bessel 2006, p. 110.
  143. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 163, 165.
  144. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 163–166.
  145. ^Evans 2008, p. 155.
  146. ^Bessel 2006, p. 111.
  147. ^Frusetta 2012, p. 266.
  148. ^Glantz 2001, pp. 7–9.
  149. ^Bracher 1970, p. 409.
  150. ^Blood 2006, p. 64.
  151. ^Windrow & Burn 1992, p. 9.
  152. ^Heer & Naumann 2000, p. 136.
  153. ^Browning 2004, p. 315.
  154. ^Hilberg 1985, p. 164.
  155. ^Kershaw 2008, pp. 696–697.
  156. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 168.
  157. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 171.
  158. ^Reynolds 1997, p. 9.
  159. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 173.
  160. ^Fritz 2011, pp. 69–70, 94–108.
  161. ^Krausnik 1968, p. 77.
  162. ^Longerich 2010, p. 185.
  163. ^ abRhodes 2003, pp. 159–160.
  164. ^Bessel 2006, pp. 118–119.
  165. ^Stackelberg 2007, p. 163.
  166. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 164.
  167. ^Bessel 2006, p. 119.
  168. ^Zentner & Bedürftig 1991, p. 227.
  169. ^Evans 2008, pp. 256–257.
  170. ^Longerich 2012, p. 547.
  171. ^Gerwarth 2011, p. 199.
  172. ^Rhodes 2003, p. 243.
  173. ^Blood 2006, pp. 70–71.
  174. ^Longerich 2012, p. 625.
  175. ^Longerich 2010, p. 198.
  176. ^Longerich 2012, pp. 626, 629.
  177. ^Longerich 2012, p. 627.
  178. ^Blood 2006, pp. 71–77.
  179. ^Blood 2006, p. 121.
  180. ^Blood 2006, pp. 152–154.
  181. ^Longerich 2012, pp. 628–629.
  182. ^Wachsmann 2010, p. 27.
  183. ^Wachsmann 2010, pp. 26–27.
  184. ^Gerwarth 2011, p. 208.
  185. ^Longerich 2010, pp. 279–280.
  186. ^Evans 2008, p. 283.
  187. ^Evans 2008, pp. 283, 287, 290.
  188. ^McNab 2009, p. 141.
  189. ^Evans 2008, pp. 295, 299–300.
  190. ^Wachsmann 2010, p. 29.
  191. ^ abLongerich 2012, p. 559.
  192. ^ abKoehl 2004, pp. 182–183.
  193. ^ abWeale 2012, p. 115.
  194. ^Gruner 2012, pp. 174–175.
  195. ^Longerich 2012, p. 629.
  196. ^Reitlinger 1989, p. 265.
  197. ^Stein 2002, pp. 258–263.
  198. ^Weale 2012, p. 114.
  199. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 119, 120.
  200. ^Mazower 2008, pp. 312–313.
  201. ^Longerich 2012, p. 485.
  202. ^Longerich 2012, p. 482.
  203. ^Allen 2002, p. 95.
  204. ^Longerich 2012, pp. 480–481.
  205. ^Longerich 2012, p. 480.
  206. ^Steinbacher 2005, p. 129.
  207. ^Steinbacher 2005, p. 56.
  208. ^Longerich 2010, p. 316.
  209. ^ abLongerich 2012, p. 484.
  210. ^Weale 2012, pp. 114–115.
  211. ^Allen 2002, p. 102.
  212. ^Weale 2012, pp. 115–116.
  213. ^Longerich 2012, p. 483.
  214. ^Frei 1993, p. 128.
  215. ^Weale 2012, p. 116.
  216. ^International Military Tribunal 1950.
  217. ^Baxter 2014, p. 67.
  218. ^Evans 2008, p. 486.
  219. ^Bessel 2006, p. 143.
  220. ^Evans 2008, pp. 488–489.
  221. ^McNab 2009, pp. 68, 70.
  222. ^Fritz 2011, p. 350.
  223. ^Ford & Zaloga 2009, p. 30.
  224. ^Ford & Zaloga 2009, pp. 54–56.
  225. ^Whitmarsh 2009, pp. 12, 13.
  226. ^Ford & Zaloga 2009, pp. 60, 63, 122, 275.
  227. ^Stein 2002, p. 219.
  228. ^McNab 2013, p. 295.
  229. ^Rempel 1989, p. 233.
  230. ^Whitmarsh 2009, p. 73.
  231. ^Ford & Zaloga 2009, p. 230.
  232. ^Wilmot 1997, p. 282.
  233. ^McNab 2013, p. 297.
  234. ^McNab 2009, p. 73.
  235. ^Wilmot 1997, pp. 399–400.
  236. ^Stein 2002, pp. 222–223.
  237. ^Wilmot 1997, p. 420.
  238. ^McNab 2013, p. 197.
  239. ^Shirer 1960, pp. 1085–1086.
  240. ^Weinberg 1994, p. 701.
  241. ^Murray & Millett 2001, pp. 439–442.
  242. ^Weinberg 1994, pp. 765–766.
  243. ^Murray & Millett 2001, p. 465.
  244. ^Weinberg 1994, pp. 767–769.
  245. ^Weinberg 1994, p. 769.
  246. ^Stein 2002, p. 232.
  247. ^Murray & Millett 2001, p. 468.
  248. ^Parker 2012, p. 278.
  249. ^Kershaw 2011, p. 168.
  250. ^Beevor 2002, p. 70.
  251. ^Beevor 2002, p. 83.
  252. ^ abDuffy 2002, p. 293.
  253. ^Ziemke 1968, p. 439.
  254. ^Beevor 2002, p. 82.
  255. ^Seaton 1971, p. 537.
  256. ^Duffy 2002, p. 294.
  257. ^Stein 2002, p. 238.
  258. ^Ziemke 1968, p. 450.
  259. ^Messenger 2001, pp. 167–168.
  260. ^Wachsmann 2015, pp. 542–548.
  261. ^Fritz 2004, pp. 50–55.
  262. ^Stein 2002, p. 237.
  263. ^ abKershaw 2011, p. 302.
  264. ^Stein 2002, p. 246.
  265. ^McNab 2013, pp. 328, 330, 338.
  266. ^Moorhouse 2012, pp. 364–365.
  267. ^Stein 2002, pp. 248–249.
  268. ^Headland 1992, p. 22.
  269. ^Weale 2010, p. 131.
  270. ^Langerbein 2003, p. 21–22.
  271. ^Höhne 2001, pp. 494–495.
  272. ^Höhne 2001, pp. 495–496.
  273. ^Longerich 2012, p. 661.
  274. ^Diner 2006, p. 123.
  275. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 228.
  276. ^Montague 2012, pp. 188–190.
  277. ^Friedlander 1997, p. 138.
  278. ^Stackelberg 2007, p. 220.
  279. ^Rhodes 2003, pp. 258–260, 262.
  280. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 195.
  281. ^ abcLongerich 2010, p. 408.
  282. ^Cesarani 2005, pp. 168, 172.
  283. ^Cesarani 2005, p. 173.
  284. ^Cesarani 2005, p. 160, 183.
  285. ^ abStreim 1989, p. 436.
  286. ^Longerich 2012, pp. 405, 412.
  287. ^Stackelberg 2007, p. 161.
  288. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 109.
  289. ^Hilberg 1985, p. 102.
  290. ^Langerbein 2003, p. 15–16.
  291. ^Rhodes 2003, p. 257.
  292. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 120–123.
  293. ^Rhodes 2003, pp. 210–214.
  294. ^Zentner & Bedürftig 1991, p. 228.
  295. ^Rhodes 2003, p. 274.
  296. ^McNab 2009, pp. 37, 40, 41.
  297. ^Bracher 1970, p. 214.
  298. ^Krüger & Wedemeyer-Kolwe 2009, p. 34.
  299. ^Krüger & Wedemeyer-Kolwe 2009, p. 35.
  300. ^McNab 2013, pp. 224–225.
  301. ^Pieper 2015, p. 38.
  302. ^McNab 2013, p. 225.
  303. ^Miller 2006, p. 308.
  304. ^Pieper 2015, pp. 52–53.
  305. ^Pieper 2015, pp. 81–90.
  306. ^Pieper 2015, pp. 81–82.
  307. ^Pieper 2015, pp. 119–120.
  308. ^Miller 2006, p. 310.
  309. ^Pieper 2015, p. 120.
  310. ^Pieper 2015, pp. 146–147.
  311. ^McNab 2013, p. 182.
  312. ^Stockert 1997, p. 229.
  313. ^McNab 2013, pp. 225–230.
  314. ^Proctor 1988, p. 86.
  315. ^Lifton 1986, p. 147.
  316. ^Levy 2006, pp. 235–237.
  317. ^Lifton 1986, pp. 148–149.
  318. ^Piper 1994, p. 170.
  319. ^Lifton & Hackett 1994, p. 304.
  320. ^Yahil 1990, p. 368.
  321. ^Yahil 1990, p. 369.
  322. ^Levy 2006, pp. 248–249.
  323. ^Posner & Ware 1986, p. 29.
  324. ^Posner & Ware 1986, p. 27.
  325. ^Lifton 1985.
  326. ^Pringle 2006, pp. 294–296.
  327. ^ abSpielvogel 1992, p. 108.
  328. ^Yenne 2010, pp. 132–133.
  329. ^Yenne 2010, pp. 128–131, 139, 142.
  330. ^Yenne 2010, p. 141.
  331. ^Lower 2013, p. 108.
  332. ^Schwarz 1997, pp. 223–244.
  333. ^Lower 2013, pp. 108–109.
  334. ^Mühlenberg 2011, pp. 13–14.
  335. ^Lower 2013, p. 109.
  336. ^Century 2011.
  337. ^Rempel 1989, pp. 223–224.
  338. ^Mühlenberg 2011, p. 27.
  339. ^Benz, Distel & Königseder 2005, p. 70.
  340. ^Flaherty 2004, p. 160.
  341. ^Koehl 2004, pp. 212–213.
  342. ^Koehl 2004, pp. 214–219.
  343. ^Gutmann 2017, Chapter 3.
  344. ^McNab 2013, pp. 272–273.
  345. ^McNab 2013, pp. 321–323.
  346. ^Höhne 2001, p. 458.
  347. ^Weale 2012, p. 306.
  348. ^Reitlinger 1989, pp. 200–204.
  349. ^Reitlinger 1989, p. 199.
  350. ^Hale 2011, pp. 264–266.
  351. ^Bishop 2005, p. 93.
  352. ^Bishop 2005, pp. 93–94.
  353. ^Müller 2012, p. 169.
  354. ^Motadel 2014, p. 242.
  355. ^Stein 2002, p. 189.
  356. ^McNab 2013, pp. 326–330.
  357. ^McNab 2013, p. 90.
  358. ^Flaherty 2004, pp. 88–92.
  359. ^Givhan 1997.
  360. ^ abYenne 2010, p. 64.
  361. ^Yenne 2010, p. 69.
  362. ^Ziegler 2014, pp. 132–134 and note 13.
  363. ^Weale 2012, p. 26.
  364. ^ abcdWeale 2012, p. 32.
  365. ^Weale 2012, p. 30.
  366. ^Weale 2012, p. 46.
  367. ^Weale 2012, p. 49.
  368. ^ abcdeWeale 2012, p. 33.
  369. ^Ziegler 2014, p. 133.
  370. ^Ziegler 2014, p. 131.
  371. ^Snyder 1994, p. 330.
  372. ^Laqueur & Baumel 2001, p. 609.
  373. ^Evans 2008, p. 724.
  374. ^Yerger 1997, pp. 13–21.
  375. ^Stackelberg 2007, p. 302.
  376. ^Browder 1996, pp. 205–206.
  377. ^Art 2006, p. 43.
  378. ^Gerwarth 2011, pp. 120–121.
  379. ^Weale 2012, p. 107.
  380. ^Gerwarth 2011, p. 121.
  381. ^Anderson 2011.
  382. ^Mang 2003, pp. 1–5.
  383. ^Höhne 2001, p. 580.
  384. ^Evans 2008, pp. 739–741.
  385. ^Longerich 2012, p. 736.
  386. ^Weale 2012, p. 410.
  387. ^Burleigh 2000, pp. 803–804.
  388. ^MacDonogh 2009, p. 3.
  389. ^Murray & Millett 2001, pp. 565–568.
  390. ^Lowe 2012, pp. 83–84.
  391. ^Lowe 2012, pp. 84–87.
  392. ^Brzezinski 2005.
  393. ^ abEvans 2008, p. 741.
  394. ^Evans 2008, pp. 741–742.
  395. ^Evans 2008, p. 743.
  396. ^Burleigh 2000, p. 804.
  397. ^Ingrao 2013, pp. 240–241.
  398. ^Evans 2008, pp. 743–744.
  399. ^Burleigh 2010, p. 549.
  400. ^Bosacki, Uhlig & Wróblewski 2008.
  401. ^Zentner & Bedürftig 1991, p. 906.
  402. ^Levy 2006, pp. 143–144.
  403. ^Cesarani 2005, p. 207.
  404. ^Arendt 2006, p. 46.
  405. ^Evans 2008, pp. 746–747.
  406. ^Levy 2006, p. 263.
  407. ^Levy 2006, pp. 264–265.
  408. ^Levy 2006, pp. 269, 273.
  409. ^Levy 2006, pp. 294–295.
  410. ^Lichtblau 2014, pp. 2–3, 10–11.
  411. ^Lichtblau 2014, pp. 29–30, 32–37, 67–68.
  412. ^Biddiscombe 2000, pp. 131–143.
  413. ^Segev 2010, pp. 106–108.
  414. ^Sereny 1974, p. 274.
  • Allen, Michael Thad (2002). The Business of Genocide: The SS, Slave Labor, and the Concentration Camps. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN978-0-8078-2677-5 .
  • Anderson, Christopher (1 November 2011). "Crossing the Painful Threshold of Memory". Vienna Review. Archived from the original on 22 March 2016 . Retrieved 16 March 2016 .
  • Arendt, Hannah (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin. ISBN978-0-14-303988-4 .
  • Art, David (2006). The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-85683-6 .
  • Ayçoberry, Pierre (1999). The Social History of the Third Reich, 1933–1945. New York: The New Press. ISBN978-1-56584-635-7 .
  • Baranowski, Shelley (2010). Nazi Empire: German Colonialism and Imperialism from Bismarck to Hitler. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-67408-9 .
  • Baxter, Ian (2014). Nazi Concentration Camp Commandants 1933–1945: Rare Photographs from Wartime Archives. Images of War. Barnsley: Pen and Sword. ISBN978-1-78159-388-2 .
  • Beevor, Antony (2002). The Fall of Berlin, 1945. New York London: Viking. ISBN978-0-670-03041-5 .
  • Benz, Wolfgang Distel, Barbara Königseder, Angelika (2005). Der Ort des Terrors: Geschichte der nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslager (vol. 7) (in German). Munich: Beck. ISBN978-3-406-52960-3 .
  • Bessel, Richard (2006). Nazism and War. New York: Modern Library. ISBN978-0-8129-7557-4 .
  • Biddiscombe, Perry (2000). "The Problem with Glass Houses: The Soviet Recruitment and Deployment of SS Men as Spies and Saboteurs". Intelligence and National Security. 15 (3): 131–145. doi:10.1080/02684520008432620. S2CID153452361.
  • Bishop, Chris (2005). Hitler's Foreign Divisions: 1940–45. London: Amber. ISBN978-1-904687-37-5 .
  • Blood, Philip W. (2006). Hitler's Bandit Hunters: The SS and the Nazi Occupation of Europe. Potomac Books. ISBN978-1-59797-021-1 .
  • Bosacki, Marcin Uhlig, Dominik Wróblewski, Bogdan (21 May 2008). "Nikt nie chce osądzić zbrodniarza". Gazecie Wyborczej (in Polish). Agora SA. Archived from the original on 7 September 2009 . Retrieved 30 December 2017 .
  • Bracher, Karl-Dietrich (1970). The German Dictatorship: The Origins, Structure and Effects of National Socialism. New York: Praeger Publishers. ASINB001JZ4T16.
  • Browder, George C (1996). Hitler's Enforcers: The Gestapo and the SS Security Service in the Nazi Revolution. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-510479-0 .
  • Browning, Christopher R. (2004). The Origins of the Final Solution : The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, September 1939 – March 1942. Comprehensive History of the Holocaust. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN978-0-8032-1327-2 .
  • Brzezinski, Matthew (24 July 2005). "Giving Hitler Hell". Washington Post . Retrieved 27 April 2020 .
  • Buchheim, Hans (1968). "The SS – Instrument of Domination". In Krausnik, Helmut Buchheim, Hans Broszat, Martin Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf (eds.). Anatomy of the SS State. New York: Walker and Company. ISBN978-0-00-211026-6 .
  • Burleigh, Michael Wippermann, Wolfgang (1991). The Racial State: Germany 1933–1945 . Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-39802-2 .
  • Burleigh, Michael (2000). The Third Reich: A New History. New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN978-0-8090-9325-0 .
  • Burleigh, Michael (2010). Moral Combat: Good and Evil in World War II. New York: Harper Collins. ISBN978-0-06-058097-1 .
  • Butler, Rupert (2001). SS-Leibstandarte: The History of the First SS Division, 1934–45. Staplehurst: Spellmount. ISBN978-1-86227-117-3 .
  • Butler, Rupert (2003). The Black Angels. Staplehurst: Spellmount. ISBN978-1-86227-117-3 .
  • Cesarani, David (2005) [2004]. Eichmann: His Life and Crimes. London: Vintage. ISBN978-0-09-944844-0 .
  • Century, Rachel (January 2011). "Review of Das SS-Helferinnenkorps: Ausbildung, Einsatz und Entnazifizierung der weiblichen Angehörigen der Waffen-SS 1942–1949". Reviews in History. Review no. 1183 . Retrieved 27 April 2020 .
  • Cook, Stan Bender, R. James (1994). Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler: Uniforms, Organization, & History. San Jose, CA: R. James Bender. ISBN978-0-912138-55-8 .
  • Dear, Ian Foot, M.R.D., eds. (1995). The Oxford Guide to World War II. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-534096-9 .
  • Diner, Dan (2006). Beyond the Conceivable: Studies on Germany, Nazism, and the Holocaust. Los Angeles Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-21345-6 .
  • Duffy, Christopher (2002). Red Storm on the Reich: The Soviet March on Germany, 1945. Edison, NJ: Castle Books. ISBN978-0-7858-1624-9 .
  • Evans, Richard J. (2003). The Coming of the Third Reich. New York: Penguin Group. ISBN978-0-14-303469-8 .
  • Evans, Richard J. (2005). The Third Reich in Power. New York: Penguin Group. ISBN978-0-14-303790-3 .
  • Evans, Richard J. (2008). The Third Reich at War. New York: Penguin Group. ISBN978-0-14-311671-4 .
  • Felton, Mark (2014). Guarding Hitler: The Secret World of the Führer. Barnsley: Pen & Sword. ISBN978-1-78159-305-9 .
  • Flaherty, Thomas H., ed. (2004) [1988]. The Third Reich: The SS. Time-Life. ISBN978-1-84447-073-0 .
  • Ford, Ken Zaloga, Steven J. (2009). Overlord: The D-Day Landings. Oxford New York: Osprey. ISBN978-1-84603-424-4 .
  • Frei, Norbert (1993). National Socialist Rule in Germany: The Führer State, 1933–1945. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN978-0-631-18507-9 .
  • Friedlander, Henry (1997). The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN978-0-8078-4675-9 .
  • Fritz, Stephen (2004). Endkampf: Soldiers, Civilians, and the Death of the Third Reich. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky. ISBN978-0-8131-2325-7 .
  • Fritz, Stephen (2011). Ostkrieg: Hitler's War of Extermination in the East. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky. ISBN978-0-8131-3416-1 .
  • Frusetta, James (2012). "The Final Solution in Southwestern Europe". In Friedman, Jonathan C. (ed.). The Routledge History of the Holocaust. New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. 264–276. ISBN978-0-415-52087-4 .
  • Gerwarth, Robert (2011). Hitler's Hangman: The Life of Heydrich. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN978-0-300-11575-8 .
  • Givhan, Robin (15 August 1997). "Clothier Made Nazi Uniforms". Los Angeles Times. The Washington Post . Retrieved 27 April 2020 .
  • Glantz, David (11 October 2001), The Soviet‐German War 1941–45: Myths and Realities: A Survey Essay, Strom Thurmond Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Clemson University, archived from the original (PDF) on 18 February 2015.
  • Gruner, Wolf (2012). "Forced Labor in Nazi Anti-Jewish Policy, 1938–45". In Friedman, Jonathan C. (ed.). The Routledge History of the Holocaust. New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. 168–180. ISBN978-0-415-52087-4 .
  • Gutmann, Martin R. (2017). Building a Nazi Europe: The SS's Germanic Volunteers. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-1-107-15543-5 .
  • Hale, Christopher (2011). Hitler's Foreign Executioners: Europe's Dirty Secret. Stroud, Gloucestershire: The History Press. ISBN978-0-7524-5974-5 .
  • Headland, Ronald (1992). Messages of Murder: A Study of the Reports of the Einsatzgruppen of the Security Police and the Security Service, 1941–1943. Rutherford, N.J: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. ISBN978-0-8386-3418-9 .
  • Heer, Hannes Naumann, Klaus (2000). War of Extermination: The German Military in World War II 1941–1944. New York: Berghahn. ISBN978-1-57181-232-2 .
  • Hein, Bastian (2015). Die SS: Geschichte und Verbrechen (in German). Munich: C.H. Beck. ISBN978-3-406-67513-3 .
  • Hellwinkel, Lars (2014). Hitler's Gateway to the Atlantic: German Naval Bases in France 1940–1945. Barnsley: Seaforth. ISBN978-1-84832-199-1 .
  • Hilberg, Raul (1985). The Destruction of the European Jews. New York: Holmes & Meier. ISBN978-0-8419-0910-6 .
  • Hildebrand, Klaus (1984). The Third Reich. London New York: Routledge. ISBN978-0-04-943033-4 .
  • Himmler, Heinrich (1936). Die Schutzstaffel als antibolschewistische Kampforganisation [The SS as an Anti-Bolshevist Fighting Organization] (in German). Franz Eher Verlag.
  • Hoffmann, Peter (2000). Hitler's Personal Security: Protecting the Führer 1921–1945. New York: Da Capo. ISBN978-0-306-80947-7 .
  • Höhne, Heinz (2001). The Order of the Death's Head: The Story of Hitler's SS. New York: Penguin. ISBN978-0-14-139012-3 .
  • Ingrao, Christian (2013). Believe and Destroy: Intellectuals in the SS War Machine. Malden, MA: Polity. ISBN978-0-7456-6026-4 .
  • International Military Tribunal (1946). Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (PDF) . 1. Washington: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 70–71.
  • International Military Tribunal (1950). "Report on the Administrative Development of Operation Reinhardt: Document NO-059: Odilo Globocnik, January 1944. Attachment NO-062: Detailed List of Money, Precious Metals, Jewels, Other Valuables, and Textiles" (PDF) . Nuremberg Trials. The Green Series. 5. Washington: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 728–731. OCLC315875936.
  • Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf (1999). "The Structure of Nazi Foreign Policy, 1933–1945". In Christian Leitz (ed.). The Third Reich: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN978-0-631-20700-9 .
  • Joachimsthaler, Anton (1999). The Last Days of Hitler: The Legends, The Evidence, The Truth. London: Brockhampton Press. ISBN978-1-86019-902-8 .
  • Kershaw, Ian (2001). Hitler: 1936–1945, Nemesis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN978-0-393-32252-1 .
  • Kershaw, Ian (2008). Hitler: A Biography. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN978-0-393-06757-6 .
  • Kershaw, Ian (2011). The End: The Defiance and Destruction of Hitler's Germany, 1944–1945. New York Toronto: Penguin. ISBN978-1-59420-314-5 .
  • Koehl, Robert (2004). The SS: A History 1919–45. Stroud: Tempus. ISBN978-0-7524-2559-7 .
  • Krausnik, Helmut (1968). "The Persecution of the Jews". In Krausnik, Helmut Buchheim, Hans Broszat, Martin Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf (eds.). Anatomy of the SS State. New York: Walker and Company. ISBN978-0-00-211026-6 .
  • Krüger, Arnd Wedemeyer-Kolwe, Bernd (2009). Vergessen, verdrängt, abgelehnt – Zur Geschichte der Ausgrenzung im Sport (in German). Münster: Lit Verlag. ISBN978-3-643-10338-3 .
  • Langerbein, Helmut (2003). Hitler's Death Squads: The Logic of Mass Murder. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. ISBN978-1-58544-285-0 .
  • Laqueur, Walter Baumel, Judith Tydor (2001). The Holocaust Encyclopedia. New Haven London: Yale University Press. ISBN978-0-300-08432-0 .
  • Levy, Alan (2006) [1993]. Nazi Hunter: The Wiesenthal File (Revised 2002 ed.). London: Constable & Robinson. ISBN978-1-84119-607-7 .
  • Lichtblau, Eric (2014). The Nazis Next Door . New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN978-0-547-66919-9 .
  • Lifton, Robert Jay (21 July 1985). "What Made This Man? Mengele". The New York Times . Retrieved 11 January 2014 .
  • Lifton, Robert Jay (1986). The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide . New York: Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-04905-9 .
  • Lifton, Robert Jay Hackett, Amy (1994). "The Auschwitz Prisoner Administration". In Gutman, Yisrael Berenbaum, Michael (eds.). Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. pp. 363–378. ISBN978-0-253-32684-3 .
  • Longerich, Peter (2010). Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-280436-5 .
  • Longerich, Peter (2012). Heinrich Himmler: A Life. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-959232-6 .
  • Lowe, Keith (2012). Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II. New York: Picador. ISBN978-1-250-03356-7 .
  • Lower, Wendy (2013). Hitler's Furies: German Women in the Nazi Killing Fields. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN978-0-547-86338-2 .
  • MacDonogh, Giles (2009). After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation. New York: Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-00337-2 .
  • Mang, Thomas (2003). "Gestapo-Leitstelle Wien – "Mein Name ist Huber " " [Head Gestapo Agency of Vienna: "My name is Huber"] (PDF) . Döw Mitteilungen (in German). 164: 1–5.
  • Manning, Jeanne (1999). A Time to Speak. Paducah, KY: Turner. ISBN978-1-56311-560-8 .
  • Mattson, Gregory L. (2002). SS-Das Reich: The History of the Second SS Division, 1944–45. Amber Books. ISBN978-0-7603-1255-1 .
  • Mazower, Mark (2008). Hitler's Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe. New York Toronto: Penguin. ISBN978-1-59420-188-2 .
  • McNab, Chris (2009). The SS: 1923–1945. London: Amber Books. ISBN978-1-906626-49-5 .
  • McNab, Chris (2013). Hitler's Elite: The SS 1939–45. Osprey. ISBN978-1-78200-088-4 .
  • Messenger, Charles (2001). Hitler's Gladiator: The Life and Military Career of Sepp Dietrich. London: Brassey's. ISBN978-1-57488-315-2 .
  • Michael, Robert Doerr, Karin (2002). Nazi-Deutsch/Nazi-German: An English Lexicon of the Language of the Third Reich. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0313321061 .
  • Miller, Michael (2006). Leaders of the SS and German Police, Vol. 1. San Jose, CA: R. James Bender. ISBN978-93-297-0037-2 .
  • Miller, Michael Schulz, Andreas (2012). Gauleiter: The Regional Leaders Of The Nazi Party And Their Deputies, 1925–1945. San Jose, CA: R. James Bender. ISBN978-1-932970-21-0 .
  • Mollo, Andrew (1991). Uniforms of the SS: Volume 3: SS-Verfügungstruppe. London: Windrow & Greene. ISBN978-1-872004-51-8 .
  • Moorhouse, Roger (2012). Berlin at War. New York: Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-02855-9 .
  • Montague, Patrick (2012). Chelmno and the Holocaust: The History of Hitler's First Death Camp. London: I.B. Tauris. pp. 188–190. ISBN978-1-84885-722-3 .
  • Motadel, David (2014). Islam and Nazi Germany's War. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-72460-0 .
  • Mühlenberg, Jutta (2011). Das SS-Helferinnenkorps: Ausbildung, Einsatz und Entnazifizierung der weiblichen Angehörigen der Waffen-SS, 1942–1949 (PDF) (in German). Hamburg: VerlagsgesmbH. ISBN978-3-86854-500-5 .
  • Müller, Rolf-Dieter (2012). The Unknown Eastern Front: The Wehrmacht and Hitler's Foreign Soldiers. New York: I.B. Taurus. ISBN978-1-78076-072-8 .
  • Murray, Williamson Millett, Allan R. (2001). A War To Be Won: Fighting the Second World War. Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-00680-5 .
  • Padfield, Peter (2001) [1990]. Himmler: Reichsführer-SS. London: Cassel & Co. ISBN978-0-304-35839-7 .
  • Parker, Danny S. (2012). Fatal Crossroads: The Untold Story of the Malmédy Massacre at the Battle of the Bulge . Cambridge, MA: Da Capo. ISBN978-0-306-81193-7 .
  • Pieper, Henning (2015). Fegelein's Horsemen and Genocidal Warfare: The SS Cavalry Brigade in the Soviet Union. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN978-1-137-45631-1 .
  • Piper, Franciszek (1994). "Gas Chambers and Crematoria". In Gutman, Yisrael Berenbaum, Michael (eds.). Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. pp. 157–182. ISBN978-0-253-32684-3 .
  • Posner, Gerald L. Ware, John (1986). Mengele: The Complete Story. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN978-0-07-050598-8 .
  • Pringle, Heather (2006). The Master Plan: Himmler's Scholars and the Holocaust. London: Fourth Estate. ISBN978-0-00-714812-7 .
  • Proctor, Robert (1988). Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-74578-0 .
  • Read, Anthony (2005). The Devil's Disciples: Hitler's Inner Circle. New York London: Norton. ISBN978-0-393-32697-0 .
  • Reitlinger, Gerald (1989). The SS: Alibi of a Nation, 1922–1945. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN978-0-306-80351-2 .
  • Rempel, Gerhard (1989). Hitler's Children: The Hitler Youth and the SS . Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN978-0-8078-4299-7 .
  • Reynolds, Michael Frank (1997). Steel Inferno: I SS Panzer Corps in Normandy: The Story of the 1st and 12th SS Panzer Divisions in the 1944 Normandy Campaign. Steelhurst: Spellmount. ISBN978-1-873376-90-4 .
  • Rhodes, Richard (2003). Masters of Death: The SS-Einsatzgruppen and the Invention of the Holocaust. New York: Vintage. ISBN978-0-375-70822-0 .
  • Rossino, Alexander B. (2003). Hitler Strikes Poland: Blitzkrieg, Ideology, and Atrocity . Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN978-0-7006-1234-5 .
  • Rummel, Rudolph (1992). Democide: Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. ISBN978-1-56000-004-4 .
  • Schwarz, Gudrun (1997). "Frauen in der SS: Sippenverband und Frauenkorps". In Kristen Heinsohn Barbara Vogel Ulrike Weckel (eds.). Zwischen Karriere und Verfolgung: Handlungsräume von Frauen im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland (in German). Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag. ISBN978-3-593-35756-0 .
  • Seaton, Albert (1971). The Russo-German War, 1941–45. New York: Praeger Publishers. ISBN978-0-213-76478-4 .
  • Segev, Tom (2010). Simon Wiesenthal: The Life and Legends. New York: Schocken Books. ISBN978-0-385-51946-5 .
  • Sereny, Gitta (1974). Into That Darkness: From Mercy Killings to Mass Murder. New York: Vintage. ISBN978-0-394-71035-8 .
  • Shirer, William L. (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN978-0-671-62420-0 .
  • Snyder, Louis (1994) [1976]. Encyclopedia of the Third Reich. Da Capo Press. ISBN978-1-56924-917-8 .
  • Spielvogel, Jackson (1992). Hitler and Nazi Germany: A History. New York: Prentice Hall. ISBN978-0-13-393182-2 .
  • Stackelberg, Roderick (2002). Hitler's Germany: Origins, Interpretations, Legacies. London New York: Taylor & Francis. ISBN978-0-203-00541-5 .
  • Stackelberg, Roderick (2007). The Routledge Companion to Nazi Germany. New York: Routledge. ISBN978-0-415-30861-8 .
  • Stein, George (2002) [1966]. The Waffen-SS: Hitler's Elite Guard at War 1939–1945. Cerberus Publishing. ISBN978-1841451008 .
  • Steinbacher, Sybille (2005) [2004]. Auschwitz: A History. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck. ISBN978-0-06-082581-2 .
  • Stockert, Peter (1997). Die Eichenlaubträger 1939–1945 Band 2 [The Oak Leaves Bearers 1939–1945 Volume 2] (in German). Bad Friedrichshall, Germany: Friedrichshaller Rundblick. ISBN978-3-9802222-9-7 .
  • Stone, David (2011). Shattered Genius: The Decline and Fall of the German General Staff in World War II. Philadelphia: Casemate. ISBN978-1-61200-098-5 .
  • Streim, Alfred (1989). "The Tasks of the SS Einsatzgruppen, pages 436–454". In Marrus, Michael (ed.). The Nazi Holocaust, Part 3, The "Final Solution": The Implementation of Mass Murder, Volume 2. Westpoint, CT: Meckler. ISBN978-0-88736-266-8 .
  • Sydnor, Charles (1977). Soldiers of Destruction: The SS Death's Head Division, 1933–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ASINB001Y18PZ6.
  • Wachsmann, Nikolaus (2010). "The Dynamics of Destruction". In Caplan, Jane Wachsmann, Nikolaus (eds.). Concentration Camps in Nazi Germany: The New Histories. New York: Routledge. ISBN978-0-415-42651-0 .
  • Wachsmann, Nikolaus (2015). KL: A History of the Nazi Concentration Camps. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN978-0-374-11825-9 .
  • Weale, Adrian (2010). The SS: A New History. London: Little, Brown. ISBN978-1-4087-0304-5 .
  • Weale, Adrian (2012). Army of Evil: A History of the SS. New York: Caliber Printing. ISBN978-0-451-23791-0 .
  • Weinberg, Gerhard (1994). A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-44317-3 .
  • Whitmarsh, Andrew (2009). D-Day in Photographs. Stroud: History Press. ISBN978-0-7524-5095-7 .
  • Williams, Max (2001). Reinhard Heydrich: The Biography (Vol. 1). Church Stretton: Ulric. ISBN978-0-9537577-5-6 .
  • Wilmot, Chester (1997) [1952]. The Struggle For Europe. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions. ISBN978-1-85326-677-5 .
  • Windrow, Martin Burn, Jeffrey (1992). The Waffen-SS. Men At Arms. London: Osprey. ISBN978-0-85045-425-3 .
  • Yahil, Leni (1990). The Holocaust: The Fate of European Jewry. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-504522-2 .
  • Yenne, Bill (2010). Hitler's Master of the Dark Arts: Himmler's Black Knights and the Occult Origins of the SS. Minneapolis: Zenith. ISBN978-0-7603-3778-3 .
  • Yerger, Mark C. (1997). Allgemeine-SS: The Commands, Units, and Leaders of the General SS. Atglen, PA: Schiffer. ISBN978-0-7643-0145-2 .
  • Zentner, Christian Bedürftig, Friedemann (1991). The Encyclopedia of the Third Reich. New York: MacMillan. ISBN978-0-02-897500-9 .
  • Ziegler, Herbert (2014). Nazi Germany's New Aristocracy: The SS Leadership, 1925–1939. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-60636-1 .
  • Ziemke, Earl F. (1968). Stalingrad to Berlin: The German Defeat in the East. Washington: Office of the Chief of Military History – US Army. ASINB002E5VBSE.
  • Browder, George C. (1990). Foundations of the Nazi Police State: The Formation of Sipo and SD. Lexington: University of Kentucky. ISBN978-0-8131-1697-6 .
  • Gellately, Robert (1990). The Gestapo and German Society: Enforcing Racial Policy, 1933–1945. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-822869-1 .
  • Johnson, Eric (1999). Nazi Terror: The Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary Germans. New York: Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-04906-6 .
  • Miller, Michael (2015). Leaders of the SS and German Police, Vol. 2. San Jose, CA: Bender. ISBN978-1-932970-25-8 .
  • Segev, Tom (1988). Soldiers of Evil: The Commandants of the Nazi Concentration Camps. New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN978-0-07-056058-1 .

300 ms 9.6% type 200 ms 6.4% Scribunto_LuaSandboxCallback::getAllExpandedArguments 180 ms 5.8% dataWrapper 160 ms 5.1% Scribunto_LuaSandboxCallback::find 140 ms 4.5% Scribunto_LuaSandboxCallback::gsub 120 ms 3.8% Scribunto_LuaSandboxCallback::anchorEncode 100 ms 3.2% [others] 640 ms 20.5% Number of Wikibase entities loaded: 1/400 -->

SAP R/3 History & Release

SAP R/3 is the former name of the main enterprise resource planning software produced by SAP AG. It is an enterprise-wide information system designed to coordinate all the resources, information, and activities needed to complete business processes such as order fulfillment or billing.

History of SAP R/3
The first version of SAP’s flagship enterprise software was a financial Accounting system named R/1 called as YSR. This was replaced by R/2 at the end of the 1970s. SAP R/2 was in a mainframe based business application software suite that was very successful in the 1980s and early 1990s. It was particularly popular with large multinational European companies who required soft-real-time business applications, with multi-currency and multi-language capabilities built in. With the advent of distributed client–server computing SAP AG brought out a client–server version of the software called SAP R/3 (The “R” was for “Real-time data processing” and 3 was for 3-tier). This new architecture is compatible with multiple platforms and operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows or UNIX. This opened up SAP to a whole new customer base.

SAP R/3 was officially launched on 6 July 1992. It was renamed SAP ERP and later again renamed ECC (ERP Central Component). SAP came to dominate the large business applications market over the next 10 years. SAP ECC 5.0 ERP is the successor of SAP R/3 4.70. The newest version of the suite is SAP ERP 6.0

• SAP R/3 Release 1.0A Release Date 6 July 1992
• SAP R/3 Release 4.0B Release Date June 1998
• SAP R/3 Release 4.5B Release Date March 1999
• SAP R/3 Release 4.6A Release Date 1999
• SAP R/3 Release 4.6B Release Date Dec 1999
• SAP R/3 Release 4.6C Release Date April 2001
• SAP R/3 Enterprise Release 4.70 Release Date March- Dec 2003
• SAP R/3 Enterprise Edition 4.7
• SAP R/3 Enterprise Central Component 5.0
• SAP R/3 Enterprise Central Component 6.0

SAP R/3 was arranged into distinct functional modules, covering the typical functions in place in an organization. The most widely used modules were Financial and Controlling (FICO), Human Resources (HR), Materials Management (MM), Sales & Distribution (SD), and Production Planning (PP).

Each module handled specific business tasks on its own, but was linked to the others where applicable. For instance, an invoice from the billing transaction of Sales & Distribution would pass through to accounting, where it will appear in accounts receivable and cost of goods sold.

SAP typically focused on best practice methodologies for driving its software processes, but more recently expanded into vertical markets. In these situations, SAP produced specialized modules (referred to as IS or Industry Specific) geared toward a particular market segment, such as utilities or retail.

Previous Releases of R for Windows

This directory contains previous binary releases of R for Windows.

The current release, and links to development snapshots, are available here. Source code for these releases and others is available through the main CRAN page.

R 4.1.0 (May, 2021)
R 4.0.5 (March, 2021)
R 4.0.4 (February, 2021)
R 4.0.3 (October, 2020)
R 4.0.2 (June, 2020)
R 4.0.1 (June, 2020)
R 4.0.0 (April, 2020)
R 3.6.3 (February, 2020)
R 3.6.2 (December, 2019)
R 3.6.1 (July, 2019)
R 3.6.0 (April, 2019)
R 3.5.3 (March, 2019)
R 3.5.2 (December, 2018)
R 3.5.1 (July, 2018)
R 3.5.0 (April, 2018)
R 3.4.4 (March, 2018)
R 3.4.3 (November, 2017)
R 3.4.2 (September, 2017)
R 3.4.1 (June, 2017)
R 3.4.0 (April, 2017)
R 3.3.3 (March, 2017)
R 3.3.2 (October, 2016)
R 3.3.1 (June, 2016)
R 3.3.0 (April, 2016)
R 3.2.5 (April, 2016)
R 3.2.4 (March, 2016)
R 3.2.3 (December, 2015)
R 3.2.2 (August, 2015)
R 3.2.1 (June, 2015)
R 3.2.0 (April, 2015)
R 3.1.3 (March, 2015)
R 3.1.2 (October, 2014)
R 3.1.1 (July, 2014)
R 3.1.0 (April, 2014)
R 3.0.3 (March, 2014)
R 3.0.2 (September, 2013)
R 3.0.1 (May, 2013)
R 3.0.0 (April, 2013)
R 2.15.3 (March, 2013)
R 2.15.2 (October, 2012)
R 2.15.1 (June, 2012)
R 2.15.0 (March, 2012)
R 2.14.2 (February, 2012)
R 2.14.1 (December, 2011)
R 2.14.0 (November, 2011)
R 2.13.2 (September, 2011)
R 2.13.1 (July, 2011)
R 2.13.0 (April, 2011)
R 2.12.2 (February, 2011)
R 2.12.1 (December, 2010)
R 2.12.0 (October, 2010)
R 2.11.1 (May, 2010)
R 2.11.0 (April, 2010)
R 2.10.1 (December, 2009)
R 2.10.0 (October, 2009)
R 2.9.2 (August, 2009)
R 2.9.1 (June, 2009)
R 2.9.0 (April, 2009)
R 2.8.1 (December, 2008)
R 2.8.0 (October, 2008)
R 2.7.2 (August, 2008)
R 2.7.1 (June, 2008)
R 2.7.0 (April, 2008)
R 2.6.2 (February, 2008)
R 2.6.1 (November, 2007)
R 2.6.0 (October, 2007)
R 2.5.1 (July, 2007)
R 2.5.0 (April, 2007)
R 2.4.1 (December, 2006)
R 2.4.0 (October, 2006)
R 2.3.1 (June, 2006)
R 2.3.0 (April, 2006)
R 2.2.1 (December, 2005)
R 2.2.0 (October, 2005)
R 2.1.1 (June, 2005)
R 2.1.0 (April, 2005)
R 2.0.1 (November, 2004)
R 2.0.0 (October, 2004)
R 1.9.1 (June, 2004)
R 1.8.1 (November, 2003)
R 1.7.1 (June, 2003)
R 1.6.2 (January, 2003)
Installer for R 1.5.1 (June, 2002)
Installer for R 1.4.1 (January, 2002)
Installer for R 1.3.1 (September, 2001)
Binary files for R 1.2.2 (March, 2001)
Binary files for R 1.0.0 (February, 2000)

Please see the R FAQ for general information about R and the R Windows FAQ for Windows-specific information.

How to access the script/source history in RStudio?

I would like to access the history of what have been typed in the source panel in RStudio.

I'm interested in the way we learn and type code. Three things I would like to analyse are: i) the way a single person type code, ii) how different persons type code, iii) the way a beginner improve typing.

Grabbing the history of commands is quite satisfying as first attempt in this way but I would like to reach a finer granularity and thus access the successive changes, within a single line in a way.

So, to be clear, I'm neither looking for the history of commands or for a diff between different versions of and .R file.

What I would like to access is really the successive alterations to the source panel that are visible when you recursively press Ctrl+Z . I do not know if there is a more accurate word for what I describe, but again what I'm interested in is how bits of code are added/moved/deleted/corrected/improved in the source panel but not necessary passed to the Console and thus absent from the history of command.

This must be somewhere/somehow saved by RStudio as it is accessible by the later. This may be saved in a quite hidden/private/memory/process/. way and I have a very vague idea of how a GUI works. I do not know it if would be easily accessible, then programmaticaly analyzed, typically if we could save a file from it. Timestamps would be the cherry on top but I would be happy without.


"EINE FESTE BURG". It means "a strong fortress" and has been the motto of R.A.F. Laarbruch since the first R.A.F. fighter flew into the newly built Station back in 1954.

Boldly displayed on the Station's badge, the motto speaks volumes about the role of the base in the time since that first flight - for R.A.F. Laarbruch is one of the key locations from which the Cold War was "fought" and won.

Located in the town of Weeze in the rural Niederrhein region of Germany and adjacent to the border with The Netherlands, the Station has been at the forefront of NATO defences for over four decades. In that time, the Station has consistently operated some of the most capable and effective aircraft in Europe, including Canberras, Buccaneers and Tornado GR1s.

The Station is now the home base for Harrier, Chinook and Puma aircraft, R.A.F. Regiment Rapier surface-to-air missiles, an R.A.F. Regiment Field Squadron and an Army Signals Squadron, accommodating over 2300 uniformed personnel in addition to around 1570 families, over 2300 children, 2 schools, 5 shops, 2 post offices, 2 banks and a building society, R.A.F. Laarbruch is the equivalent of a small town.

Indeed, our population exceeds that of several of the local German and Dutch towns and we are the largest employer for over 40 kilometres in any direction.

From the original concept of a reconnaissance base, operating Meteor and Canberra aircraft, to the home, since 1992, of the Harrier and Support Helicopter forces in Germany, Laarbruch has come a long way.

Although the Cold War is now over, the role of the Station remains as vital as ever indeed the Station is as busy now as it has ever been. NATO too has come a long way over the last 40 years. Having re-assessed its role after the fall of Communism, the result is "Reaction Forces".

This means a change from the old concept of fighting from fixed "strong fortress" home bases, to a new regime where forces have to be prepared to deploy elsewhere to defend N.A.T.O. interests either inside or outside Alliance Boundaries. In short, we now go to where the action is, rather than wait for the action to come to us and it is for this role that R.A.F. Laarbruch is optimised.

The mix of forces now at Laarbruch is one of the most mobile in the R.A.F., with the Harrier and Support Helicopter forces, our 3 Regiment units and our engineering, logistics and administrative elements are able to operate as effectively from a field as from a fixed base. As if to prove this new concept, it is in peacekeeping or defensive operations outside the Alliance boundaries in which all of Laarbruch's units have been recently involved.

Since equipping with the new Harrier GR7 aircraft, No 3(Fighter) Squadron and No IV(Army Co-operation) Squadron, based at R.A.F. Laarbruch, have seen active service over Iraq as part of Operation PROVIDE COMFORT (the no-fly zone in Northern Iraq) and more recently over Bosnia as part of Operation DECISIVE EDGE (formerly DENY FLIGHT).

The Harrier Force has a third Squadron, No 1 (Fighter) Squadron based at R.A.F. Wittering in the UK, and the 3 Squadrons have shared the commitment to Operation DECISIVE EDGE between them, deploying to Gioia Del Colle in Southern Italy for two months at a time.

The Harrier Force assumed the peacekeeping duties over Bosnia in August 1995 and, almost immediately, IV (AC) Squadron was involved in Operation DELIBERATE FORCE, the bombing campaign against the Bosnian Serbs, which ultimately led to the signing of the Dayton peace accord, which brought peace to the war-torn region. Flying over 180 missions with 12 Harrier GR7 aircraft, the Harrier Force proved beyond doubt both its operational effectiveness and its outstanding reliability.

The Harrier GR7 is the most modern aircraft in the R.A.F.'s inventory. Able to take off from an extremely short emergency landing strip, hover motionless in the air and come in to land vertically, it is also the most flexible. Optimised for low-level attack by day or night, its capability to carry and deliver weaponry cannot be matched by any other Close-Air-Support aircraft and its combat radius is equally impressive.

Recently, the Harrier Force has been exercising a further capability - operating from Royal Navy carriers alongside the Sea Harrier FA2. This mix of aircraft will be most potent indeed. With the GR7's capabilities for ground attack and reconnaissance and the FA2's impressive air defence abilities, RN carriers will certainly pack a mighty punch.

But it is not just the Harrier Force that has been busy indeed the support helicopters of No 18 (Bomber) Squadron are among the most sought after assets in the R.A.F.

Primarily tasked with supporting the British Army in Germany with trooping, logistic re-supply and casualty evacuation, it is support for peacekeeping operations that has been the real focus of activity for the Squadron.

Since January 1996, 18(B) Squadron has maintained two Chinook aircraft, two crews and engineering personnel in Split, Croatia. Flying alongside four more Chinooks from R.A.F. Odiham and four RN Sea King helicopters, the helicopters based at Split have provided essential support for the British and other troops involved in "IFOR", the NATO Implementation Force, which has brought peace to Bosnia. The Squadron also supplies a Chinook crew for 78 Squadron in the Falkland Isles.

18(B) Squadron is unique in the R.A.F., being the only unit to operate a mixed fleet of Chinook and Puma aircraft. The Chinook is the mightiest helicopter ever to see R.A.F. service, able to carry loads of up to 10 tonnes or 54 troops. The Chinook can fly for 8 hours and 45 minutes (with the assistance of ferry tanks) giving it a range of almost 1000 nautical miles.

The Puma is smaller but more nimble and can carry loads of 2 tonnes or an infantry section - 16 troops. Both helicopters can be operated at night at low level, giving them a useful capability to support Special Forces operations - a capability which is often trained for with the Forces of other NATO countries, most notably Denmark and The Netherlands.

In order for our aircraft to operate effectively in the air, they must have a safe "base" on the ground, at which they can land, refuel and, when necessary, be repaired. In order to ensure the security of such a base - wherever that may be - R.A.F. Laarbruch has three R.A.F. Regiment units to do just that.

The Tactical Survive to Operate Headquarters is a headquarters unit which deploys with the Harrier and helicopter forces to provide command and control for all "survive to operate" assets - such as ground defence, air defence, military police, fire and explosive ordnance disposal units. Laarbruch's field squadron, No 1 Squadron R.A.F. Regiment, the longest-standing Regiment squadron in the R.A.F., is equipped to provide effective ground defence with over 160 men and powerful 81mm mortars.

Recently, the Squadron has seen service in the Former Yugoslavia and Northern Ireland and it is also declared to NATO as a Reaction Forces (Air) unit, which stands ready to deploy anywhere to make ready and secure a base prior to the deployment of NATO aircraft.

Air defence is provided by No 26 Squadron R.A.F. Regiment, which was the first unit, Army or R.A.F., to equip with the new Rapier Field Standard "C" short-range air defence missile system. The Squadron has 6 Rapier Filed Standard "C" systems, which can deploy in a ring around an aircraft base, either in the field or at a fixed main operating base to provide an imposing air defence barrier, which potentially hostile aircraft attempt to breach at their peril.

Earlier this year, 26 Squadron returned from a deployment to the Falkland Islands, where it installed Rapier Field Standard "C" at R.A.F. Mount Pleasant to replace the older and less capable Rapier Field Standard B1.

Of course, all of this operational capability can be maintained only when the aircraft and equipment are in tip-top condition and this is ensured by the Station's Engineering and Supply Wing, with almost 900 engineering and logistics personnel. Responsible primarily for the maintenance of Laarbruch's aircraft, Engineering and Supply Wing also looks after all the Station's ground support equipment, communications equipment, radar, aircraft navigation aids and weaponry, and operates the largest vehicle fleet in the R.A.F., with almost 1100 vehicles.

Operations Wing is responsible for providing an excellent airfield for the flying squadrons and visiting NATO aircraft. From Air Traffic Control to the Fire section, the airfield at Laarbruch has all the facilities you would expect to find at a civilian airport of this size.

The third functional Wing at R.A.F. Laarbruch, Administration Wing, is as vital to the Station as any other asset, being responsible for providing all the accommodation, catering, personnel, administration, education, medical, and dental services and security.

This is an especially large task here in Germany because the R.A.F. has a duty to care for the families or our personnel, which, at UK stations, is carried out by local civilian authorities. For example, R.A.F. doctors and dentists treat our families as well as the Servicemen, there are two schools on base providing education for our children and our R.A.F. Education Centre is used by Servicemen and families to study for, and take, language or UK examinations.

Naturally, the most unusual aspect of life here at R.A.F. Laarbruch is the fact that we live in Germany. The differences in language and culture between the UK and Germany add an interesting dimension to life in the R.A.F.. Our presence here also enhances the lives of our local community - with whom we enjoy an extremely good relationship - both economically and culturally.

This good relationship is aptly demonstrated by the fact that Laarbruch was the first foreign military unit to be awarded the Freedom of its local German town, when in 1974, the town of Weeze awarded us that privilege and made all Laarbruch personnel Honorary Citizens of Weeze. Each of the flying squadrons at Laarbruch has formal twinning arrangements with a local town and Laarbruch remains the only foreign military unit ever to be invited to host the largest local festival in the North German calendar, the Kirmes Festival, which is held annually by one town in the Region in turn.

From its humble beginnings as a religious festival in the 11th century, Kirmes has grown in size to become a most important celebration and Laarbruch has hosted the Weeze Kirmes Festival on three occasions - most recently in 1986, when the Station Commander was the "Festkettentrager" (Chain Holder) or figurehead for the entire festival. This occasion reinforced the genuine friendship that exists between the British and German populations in this area and this friendship is a source of great pride to both communities.

Laarbruch's position on the Dutch border means that our economic influence extends into The Netherlands, and relations with the local Dutch towns remain excellent. This already excellent relationship was enhanced in 1995 when Laarbruch Regiment personnel were involved in saving two Dutch towns from devastation during flooding of the River Maas.

You may have heard that R.A.F. Laarbruch will close in 1999 after 45 years of continuous operations. The Harriers, helicopters and R.A.F. Regiment units and all Station personnel will return to the UK. This decision has been taken for simple financial reasons and does not alter the R.A.F.'s commitment to NATO one iota.

In the era of Reaction Forces, when our men and machines can be expected to deploy anywhere in the World at short notice and operate there as effectively as they would at home, it is no longer important to have forces forward deployed in Germany.

Despite the fact that the end of an era is almost upon us, the mood at R.A.F. Laarbruch has not changed. All of the forces here will continue to provide the UK and NATO with important military capabilities long after 1999. There is no time for sadness there is still important work to be done.

The following paragraphs were translated from German and was first published in "Aktionsgemeinschaft pro-niederrhein" © Aktionsgemeinschaft pro-niederrhein

At the times of cold war the NATO decided to build up an "unsinkable flattop" in West-Germany, especially in the Rhineland. Royal Air Force (R.A.F.) built up the military infrastructure in the northern Rhineland. A lot of airbases like Wildenrath, Bruggen and Geilenkirchen were put up. In 1953 building of the airbase in Weeze-Laarbruch began. Before World War II the terrain has been used as an airfield for sailplanes.

Regular operation on the airbase began in November 1954. Normally three or four squadrons, sometimes even five, were stationed here. In the beginning of the 80's the airbase was widely upgraded so four squadrons with more than sixty jets could be sheltered at Laarbruch.

Beside R.A.F. Bruggen, Laarbruch was the best equipped NATO-airbase of the Royal Air Force in Germany, the more so as all squadrons became the Tornado-jet, state of the art at it's time. About 2.200 soldiers worked at Laarbruch, together with their families it were around 6.000 British people living at Laarbruch, at Goch and in the so called "Englaendersiedlung" in Weeze.

Many contacts and co-operations on all levels show the amicable relation between the British and their German hosts in Weeze and the surrounding townships. R.A.F.-Laarbruch was, referring to their own words, the biggest employer within the circumcircle of 40 kilometres. The number of civil employees was around 600. About 100 M DM of buying power was spent in the region.

At the time the eastern bloc crumbled, the R.A.F. began to disengage in Germany. First the British airbases in Gutersloh and Wildenrath were closed. In 1994 the R.A.F. decided to close Laarbruch as well.

In May 1999 the last jet planes left the airfield. On November, 30th of the same year the terrain of the airbase was handed over to the German authorities. But for many British personell, the area had become home and have stayed as civilian in the region.

After a while as sleeping beauty, about two years, working began to convert the former airbase into a civil airport. On May, 1st. the first civil aeroplane, operated by Ryanair, landed on the new "Airport Niederrhein", opening the new route connecting Weeze to London-Stansted. Meanwhile seven destinations are reachable from "Airport Weeze" as it has been named in between.

© Aktionsgemeinschaft pro-niederrhein - "Aktionsgemeinschaft pro-niederrhein"

History of R-1 SS 78 - History

By Blaine Taylor

According to The History Channel’s Tales of the Gun, the Mauser 98 was “the best bolt action rifle ever made.” Author Robert W.D. Ball added that the Mauser was “a safe and robust rifle with a five-round clip, and the world’s most popular rifle 30 countries used it, and 100 million units were manufactured between 1898-1945, during which it was employed in both world wars by the German Army. At 49 inches long, the shorter carbine K98k World War II version witnessed 14 million produced.” Ball’s epochal 2000 work Mauser Military Rifles of the World also calls the Model 1871 “the best rifle in history,” somewhat akin to the famed French Dreyse needle gun. Indeed, proclaims one dealer, “No rifle has more history and quality than Paul Mauser’s K98!” (Read more about these and other weapons that have defined the history of warfare inside the pages of Military Heritage magazine.)

The Proliferate Mauser Bolt-Action Rifle

The best Mauser was also the original, copied by every major rifle maker and never beaten. It was and remains first in strength, reliability, accuracy, and safety. Built for the rigors of combat, the K98k served its users well for a lifetime. The final long-slide, side-mount model of the renowned German Army sniper rifle of World War II used both scope and iron sights. The first of the long-eyed Relief Snipers—the original scout rifle—is copied even today. Mauser 98 Karbine Model M24/47 was first manufactured in 1924 with FN (Browning) technology, and was known as the M24. The World War II-era K98 Mauser variant was known as the M48, and was also celebrated as being “great for shooting or collecting.”

Among the many nations that have employed the Mauser bolt-action weapons over the years for their armed forces are Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Germany, Greece, Guatamala, Haiti, Honduras, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Manchuria, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, the Orange Free State, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Serbia/ Yugoslavia, the Slovak Republic, the South African Republic, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Thailand/Siam, Transvaal, Turkey, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Yemen. One estimate of the number of Mauser rifles produced is an astounding 102 million.

The Rifle’s Notable Design Characteristics

Many believe that the Germans marked every rifle with a secret factory code, a date code, and military inspection stamps with proof marks, depending on where the rifle was manufactured. Several Mauser rifles were built in captured factories in Belgium (Browning) and also in the former Czechoslovakia (CZ Brno), now the Czech Republic. More rifles were built that were intended for other countries as well. The “bnz” code with the single Gestapo rune and the “41” code signify that a particular rifle was manufactured that year for the German Secret State Police, many at the SS concentration camp in Styr, Austria.

The famous Nazi eagle—both with and without an associated inspector number—appeared on rifles produced during 1935-1945. These two markings were stamped on various individual parts depending on when and in which factory the rifle was manufactured. The notorious Totenkopf (death’s head) was affixed for a small number of rifles that were intended for use by special SS troops, stamped on the barrel on the left side immediately ahead of the receiver. This same death’s head was sometimes also stamped to the underside of the stock immediately behind the trigger guard in the underside of the grip.

Of particular interest are some sniper rifles that make use of the original long-eye relief system. They are the famous ZF-41 models with the long-eye scope mount built into the rear sight base. Some sniper rifle models have high turret mounts, while others have the German long claw-type mounts.

Even today, Mauser rifles are highly regarded globally for their strength, reliability, and legendary accuracy. In 1866, the year of the Prusso-Austrian Six Weeks’ War that saw Prussia reign supreme within the various German states, gun maker Peter Paul Mauser developed his self-cocking system for the Dreyse needle rifle.

The Men Behind the Mauser 98

Peter Paul Mauser was born on June 27, 1838, in Oberndorf am Neckar in Wurttemberg, Germany. Brother Wilhelm was four years older, and their father, Franz Andreas Mauser, was a gunsmith at the Wurttemberg Royal Armory, established by King Frederick I on July 31, 1811.

Mauser senior married in 1819, and the couple eventually had 13 children. Another Mauser, son Franz, immigrated to America in 1853 and worked at E. Remington & Sons. Peter Paul Mauser was drafted into the Prussian Army in 1859, becoming an artilleryman at the Ludwigsburg arsenal, where he began his own career as a gunsmith. Using the Dreyse needle gun as a model, Mauser developed his own rifle with a turn bolt mechanism that cocked the gun as it was manipulated by its firer. At first, this weapon also used a firing pin that fired a rear ignition cartridge.

A German Army cavalryman fires his Mauser 98 bolt action rifle standing atop a horse in a prewar demonstration.

Although the Mauser was shown to many governments, it was only after the Prussian victory over Hapsburg Austria in 1866 that the famed American gun maker Remington & Sons showed any real interest in Mauser’s new invention. Remington’s Samuel Norris felt that the design could be made to convert Chassepot needle guns to fire metallic cartridges, and soon thereafter a partnership between Norris and the Mauser brothers was formed in Oberndorf, Germany.

The company was moved to Leige, Belgium, the following year, but when the French showed no interest in a Chassepot model, the partnership was dissolved. By mid-1870, both Mauser brothers, Peter Paul and Wilhelm, returned to Oberndorf, where they continued developmental work on the new rifle.

Adopting the Mauser Design

The Royal Prussian state accepted the weapon for service on December 2, 1871, just after the Franco-Prussian War that defeated Imperial France and united Germany around Prussia’s steel core had been concluded. Thus, the Mauser did not come on line until February 14, 1872, in the early years of the new German Empire. The delay had been occasioned by the military, which required a design change to the safety lock.

While official government arsenals and larger German industrial firms received contracts for actual production of the new weapon, the Mauser brothers were awarded an order for 3,000 sights, produced by the Xaver Jauch factory starting on May 1, 1872. After the brothers received a contract for 100,000 more sights, they bought the Royal Wurttemberg Armory in the Neckar River valley, and there they built an Upper Works in 1874. That same year, they received another contract to manufacture 100,000 Model 71 rifles. They also had a trio of factories in Oberndorf under a new partnership formed between the brothers and the Wurttemberg United Bank of Stuttgart in Saxony, one of the new federated German states within the empire.

Wilhelm died on January 13, 1882, and the following year the partnership became a stock company named Waffenfabrik (Arms Manufacturer) Mauser. Paul Mauser’s shares were sold in 1887, but he stayed on as the firm’s technical director. Mauser AG was formed a decade later and after World War II, it was renamed the Industrial Works Karlsruhe AG.

A single shot, bolt-action rifle had been developed during 1867-1869 by Mauser and Norris, and an improved version utilized a coil spring wrapped around the firing pin, a safety, and a cocking piece attached to the rear of the firing pin. This was the weapon adopted officially by the Royal Prussian and Imperial German Armies (but not the Kingdom of Bavaria) as the Infantry Rifle Model 71 on February 14, 1872. According to noted authority W.H.B. Smith, in his work Mauser Rifles and Pistols, “The truly revolutionary features in the design are strictly those of Peter Paul Mauser.”

Manufacture of the infantry version that fired a black powder 11x60mm round from a long 850mm barrel began at Oberndorf, and shorter versions were later made with the 700mm barrel hunter weapon and the 500mm cavalry carbine as well. Noted one source, “A number of slightly modified versions were widely sold to other countries … Serbia designed an improved version of the Model 71 in 10.15mm caliber, produced in Germany, and called the Mauser-Milanovic M1878/80. In 1884, an eight-shot tubular magazine was added by Mauser, who offered the Model 71/84. The Turkish Model 1887 rifle was the first of a series of rifles produced for the Turkish Army by Mauser. Its design echoed that of the German Gewehr 71/84 service rifle, being a bolt-action weapon with a tubular magazine beneath the barrel.”

Development of the Model 98 Mauser Rifle

In 1888, the Year of the Three Kaisers in the Reich, the German Army introduced the Model 1888 Commission Rifle, along with a modified Mauser action and a Mannlicher-style box magazine, with an additional carbine version, the Karabiner 88. Both were updated in the early 1900s and saw service in the Great War of 1914-1918, but the Gewehr 88 was not a fully Mauser-designed and -engineered rifle.

A smokeless powder was introduced that provided its users safety from return enemy fire with its 7.92mm round, a rimless cartridge that allowed for smoother feeding for both rifles and machine guns. The initial bullet had a rounded head, while several redesigned versions, including the spitzer bullet and boat tail, brought the cartridge to its later potency. The Mauser 91 adopted a 7.65mm, round-nosed cartridge. Ironically, the 89 Mauser rejected by Germany in 1884 entered service in 1940, when it was issued to second-line German Army units in Norway, Denmark, Holland, and Belgium.

The Model 1893 Mauser became known as “the Spanish Mauser” and was used by the Spanish Army against the Americans in 1898 at the Battle of San Juan Hill. The use of smokeless powder gave a serious advantage to the Spanish soldiers in Cuba, when they faced the American with their U.S. Army Springfield rifles.

That same year, the Imperial German Army of Kaiser Wilhelm II purchased the Model 98 Mauser design rifle that officially entered service as the Gew. 98 on April 5. “This remains by far the most successful of the Mauser designs, helped of course by the onset of two world wars that demanded vast numbers of rifles,” commented one arms expert.

The Mauser’s Wartime Service

Peter Paul Mauser died on May 29, 1914, just before the start of World War I that August. It was in large part the tragic events of World War I that helped immortalize both his name and the weapon that bore it. The Mauser 98 and its several variants included both a five-round and a 20-round box magazine.

During a counterattack near Orel on the Eastern Front, a German soldier is seen carrying his trusty Mauser bolt action. The reliable Mauser was exported to numerous countries and is still in use today.

Originally, the German Imperial cavalry used the shorter carbine versions, and by 1918, the new special storm troop trench units also employed Mausers. Both empire and republic came and went, and under the new Third Reich of Adolf Hitler in 1935, the Mauser Karabiner (Carbine) 98 Kurz (Short) was adopted as the standard German Army infantry rifle. It served in that capacity until the end of World War II a decade later. In 1941, the Mauser Company took part in a competition to re-equip the German Army with a semi-automatic rifle as well, but the Mauser-designed version failed miserably on testing and was cancelled after a short production run.

Surviving the War: The Mauser Company Legacy

Under the French Army, the entire factory at Oberndorf was dismantled, and all its records destroyed. In the initial postwar years, the Mauser Works made precision measurement instruments and tools, such as micrometers. Former company engineers saved what they could and founded the later famous firm of Hechler & Koch. Mauser continued to make hunting and sporting rifles, however, and in 1994 became part of Rheinmetal AG. In 1999, the civilian manufacture of hunting, defense, and sporting rifles was split off from Rheinmetall. Numerous Mauser surplus military rifles entered the peacetime civilian market, where they remain today.

Through the decades, the firm also made several military pistol models. These include the C1896 pistol the Mauser 1910 and 1914 pocket pistols and another such model 20 years later in 1934, under the Nazis plus the 2008 Mauser M2 handgun.

In 1954, Mauser as a firm bearing that famous name was formally reestablished. In 2004 it became a subsidiary of SIG SAUER firm, one of the largest firearms manufacturing entities in the world.

2014: R-CNN - An Early Application of CNNs to Object Detection

Inspired by the research of Hinton’s lab at the University of Toronto, a small team at UC Berkeley, led by Professor Jitendra Malik, asked themselves what today seems like an inevitable question:

To what extent do [Krizhevsky et. al’s results] generalize to object detection?

Object detection is the task of finding the different objects in an image and classifying them (as seen in the image above). The team, comprised of Ross Girshick (a name we’ll see again), Jeff Donahue, and Trevor Darrel found that this problem can be solved with Krizhevsky’s results by testing on the PASCAL VOC Challenge, a popular object detection challenge akin to ImageNet. They write,

This paper is the first to show that a CNN can lead to dramatically higher object detection performance on PASCAL VOC as compared to systems based on simpler HOG-like features.

Let’s now take a moment to understand how their architecture, Regions With CNNs (R-CNN) works.

Understanding R-CNN

The goal of R-CNN is to take in an image, and correctly identify where the main objects (via a bounding box) in the image.

  • Inputs: Image
  • Outputs: Bounding boxes + labels for each object in the image.

But how do we find out where these bounding boxes are? R-CNN does what we might intuitively do as well - propose a bunch of boxes in the image and see if any of them actually correspond to an object.

R-CNN creates these bounding boxes, or region proposals, using a process called Selective Search which you can read about here. At a high level, Selective Search (shown in the image above) looks at the image through windows of different sizes, and for each size tries to group together adjacent pixels by texture, color, or intensity to identify objects.

Once the proposals are created, R-CNN warps the region to a standard square size and passes it through to a modified version of AlexNet (the winning submission to ImageNet 2012 that inspired R-CNN), as shown above.

On the final layer of the CNN, R-CNN adds a Support Vector Machine (SVM) that simply classifies whether this is an object, and if so what object. This is step 4 in the image above.

Improving the Bounding Boxes

Now, having found the object in the box, can we tighten the box to fit the true dimensions of the object? We can, and this is the final step of R-CNN. R-CNN runs a simple linear regression on the region proposal to generate tighter bounding box coordinates to get our final result. Here are the inputs and outputs of this regression model:

  • Inputs: sub-regions of the image corresponding to objects.
  • Outputs: New bounding box coordinates for the object in the sub-region.

So, to summarize, R-CNN is just the following steps:

  1. Generate a set of proposals for bounding boxes.
  2. Run the images in the bounding boxes through a pre-trained AlexNet and finally an SVM to see what object the image in the box is.
  3. Run the box through a linear regression model to output tighter coordinates for the box once the object has been classified.

History of R-1 SS 78 - History

Load or save or display the commands history.



The name of the file in which to save the history, or from which to load it. The path is relative to the current working directory.

The maximum number of lines to show. Inf will give all of the currently available history.

logical. If true, the lines are shown in reverse order. Note: this is not useful when there are continuation lines.

A character string to be matched against the lines of the history. When supplied, only unique matching lines are shown.

Arguments to be passed to grep when doing the matching.

A value or vector of values to be written into the history.

A prefix to apply to each line.

A suffix to apply to each line.

If TRUE , suppress printing timestamp to the console.


There are several history mechanisms available for the different R consoles, which work in similar but not identical ways. Notably, there are different implementations for Unix and Windows.

The functions described here work in Rgui and interactive Rterm but not in batch use of Rterm nor in embedded/DCOM versions.

The functions described here work under the readline command-line interface but may not otherwise (for example, in batch use or in an embedded application). Note that R can be built without readline .

R.app , the console on macOS, has a separate and largely incompatible history mechanism, which by default uses a file &lsquo .Rapp.history &rsquo and saves up to 250 entries. These functions are not currently implemented there.

The ( readline on Unix-alikes) history mechanism is controlled by two environment variables: R_HISTSIZE controls the number of lines that are saved (default 512), and R_HISTFILE (default &lsquo .Rhistory &rsquo) sets the filename used for the loading/saving of history if requested at the beginning/end of a session (but not the default for loadhistory / savehistory ). There is no limit on the number of lines of history retained during a session, so setting R_HISTSIZE to a large value has no penalty unless a large file is actually generated.

These environment variables are read at the time of saving, so can be altered within a session by the use of Sys.setenv .

On Unix-alikes: Note that readline history library saves files with permission 0600 , that is with read/write permission for the user and not even read permission for any other account.

The timestamp function writes a timestamp (or other message) into the history and echos it to the console. On platforms that do not support a history mechanism only the console message is printed.

If you want to save the history at the end of (almost) every interactive session (even those in which you do not save the workspace), you can put a call to savehistory() in .Last . See the examples.

Watch the video: One Direction - History Karaoke Version